From nobody Thu May 18 15:33:24 2023
X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QMYsQ0m8vz4BhC5
	for <freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 May 2023 15:33:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from samm@freebsd.org)
Received: from reindeer.net-art.cz (reindeer.net-art.cz [IPv6:2001:15e8:110:513c::1])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "reindeer.net-art.cz", Issuer "R3" (verified OK))
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QMYsP5dvzz4MBt
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 May 2023 15:33:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from samm@freebsd.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: by reindeer.net-art.cz (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id 198855F188; Thu, 18 May 2023 16:33:24 +0100 (BST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on reindeer
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from owl.net-art.cz (unknown [IPv6:2a03:6920:0:10::101])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "owl.net-art.cz", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
	by reindeer.net-art.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA2D35EEB7;
	Thu, 18 May 2023 16:33:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [::1] (account samm@net-art.cz HELO webmail.net-art.cz)
  by owl.net-art.cz (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.20)
  with ESMTPA id 1809640; Thu, 18 May 2023 17:33:24 +0200
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-arm+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-arm+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 17:33:24 +0200
From: Alex Samorukov <samm@freebsd.org>
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Cc: Jason Bacon <bacon4000@gmail.com>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: VirtualBox
In-Reply-To: <202305181358.34IDwX6o088856@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
References: <202305181358.34IDwX6o088856@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-ID: <8677136eca659468ec4690727ef9cf53@freebsd.org>
X-Sender: samm@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QMYsP5dvzz4MBt
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:24806, ipnet:2001:15e8::/32, country:CZ]
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N

On 2023/05/18 15:58, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> VirtualBox is x86 emu.
> Yes, and it now runs on Mac/Arm64 as of version 7, but it
> is known to of shakey alpha quality.
> 
But i think it still emulates x86, so probably will be damned slow. I 
think on MacOS using qemu is a best way to run FreeBSD, of course 
aarch64. I found performance very good, as well as stability.