From nobody Tue May 16 15:41:46 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QLL7w4BdGz4B9Jm for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 15:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QLL7w2KZpz3rfy for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 15:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC205C01F8; Tue, 16 May 2023 11:41:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 May 2023 11:41:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdio.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1684251708; x=1684338108; bh=iEwvA+JUhj+/TDdp0mnEiiTPQvyQBj8lPtR TIBfsW1s=; b=QI4vapwrH/QpR2mP8LX4zsGp0YKMvBhn7aYLPuo6tSZXbTtov58 m6kJje1i4GfeCo6Myyfe/oOUjd0DN6nPS6TEvIJgJ1O8789RFLCR/ekZqynlR2Bf 3q7oc+XExrVzgLGXtEqYs/pc3oiQvuyk3vHh261fgWLAHL8oR+jw7WvG79FPgsPE hcwGU6hiAryUVqVaCYec1XViz10t69biXhQgOhIJFMsudw/ONaZbh7W3apY42fmq YzxDcBuSFIS2tOK+KEDCldLPXK32JKm+A9zdM6/P3U0hAvpnsTlhrjhnPMmHXbHw DMU55PHi5yrB9dP+vDmhsLpZXpOoSkPpJVA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1684251708; x=1684338108; bh=iEwvA+JUhj+/TDdp0mnEiiTPQvyQBj8lPtR TIBfsW1s=; b=Eo9RbmkPPJhyMqKJuOAqPqfKShaYXsObpL1fpM6Ep4n+v704uMc 8rAki8z3pSCAzuynJU1JqMGO7I73uka+adRTCM+YJEZIV4RIPJ+TqdBSGIpICMsK v4YI3slEhKPF1ZjVG+BeF9hh3VRG0GEoKeLhJKYtfNnm4AsK2Wb9urOyRbWkcRRO gaObHlI2iM8MANzvBSn4/uZSBp6wrDIdMI7rfQOmt1iLZ+dibtS3G419pn6GqWwc 3+qqtfousbiuQ9pRyAKCb/+mVKw+2ty3ZhibYw36LRg5PdESQjSK3j7nwTUmA6j+ 9NNFCKvvgKiz2zMSjQcZbzYsJ8ywWTemhow== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeehledgledtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfhffuvfevfhgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvggs vggttggrucevrhgrnhcuoehrvggsvggttggrsegsshguihhordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeetlefhfedtieehkeevhfeukeeftdekvddufedvledtffeuvdffleeuheeg veehfeenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghdpsghhhihvvggtohhnrdhorh hgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprhgv sggvtggtrgessghsughiohdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i5b994698:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 16 May 2023 11:41:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <08360ee6-6829-5362-8188-cdbd2c20e59b@bsdio.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 09:41:46 -0600 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 From: Rebecca Cran Subject: Re: ARM64 virtualization? To: Matthew Grooms , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Cc: Elena Mihailescu , Mihai Carabas References: <7CCEC16E-41A1-4318-B953-EF61D17EEE3C@mit.edu> <2f69f9a1-e976-65d6-c0be-74404640d1c1@shrew.net> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <2f69f9a1-e976-65d6-c0be-74404640d1c1@shrew.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QLL7w2KZpz3rfy X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19151, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 5/15/23 13:58, Matthew Grooms wrote: > On 5/15/2023 2:39 PM, John F Carr wrote: >> Is there any active work on getting bhyve virtualization working on >> 64 bit ARM?  I see some work was started a few years ago (e.g. >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26976, >> https://bhyvecon.org/bhyvecon2016-Mihai.pdf).  It seems to have been >> abandoned or at least stalled. >> >> I may be able to help.  It's not a project I can take on myself. > > Porting bhyve to arm has been one of the longest running UPB projects. > You can find more info on the history here ... > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/DevSummit/202303?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=Presentation+-+bhyvecon.pdf > > > Your best bet is probably to take a look a the following review opened > by Andrew Turner late last year. His work is based on the original > port by the UPB team ... > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37428 > > I can't speak to the current state of this work. From what I recall, > there were several attempts made by UPB to collaborate, but they > failed to get a response. Perhaps he/they can chime in here with more > detail. I'll be getting an Ampere system in the next few weeks and hope to be able to work on the Aarch64 bhyve code. -- Rebecca Cran