Re: Poudriere friendly armv7 relases
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: Poudriere friendly armv7 relases"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:32:12 UTC
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:25:52PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:23 PM Mitchell Horne <mhorne@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 3/20/23 17:06, Warner Losh wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > Since it looks like we're going to retain at least armv7 for FreeBSD 14 > > > (armv6 has been nominated for deprecation, but if it isn't deprecated, > > > all this applies to it). > > > > > > I'd like to start making at least the base.tgz, etc available for armv7. > > > This would allow us to create armv7 poduriere jails without building > > > from source. > > > > > > Is there some reason we're not doing this today? I know ISOs don't make > > > a lot of sense in the arm ecosystem, but having these artifacts would > > > enable poudriere binary install support. > > > > > > Comments? > > > > > > > I more-or-less proposed this in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29923. See > > the discussion that follows. Basically this is in re@'s hands and you > > should make some noise in their direction. > > > > Ah, that's why I thought it was tied to .iso creation :). Maybe the right > thing is to just do it for 14 and let the fallout happen and be worked > through :) > It is only tied into ISO creation in the sense of "that is where the bootonly.iso fetches the sets to extract" sense. In this case, I am not sure if the chicken or the egg came first. Glen