Re: uBoot broken on RPI2 Model B?

On 3/3/2023 22:16, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2023, at 17:48, Karl Denninger<karl@denninger.net>  wrote:
>
>> On 3/3/2023 19:36, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> On Mar 3, 2023, at 14:50, Karl Denninger<karl@denninger.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 3/3/2023 16:12, Karl Denninger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just tried to build -13STABLE for the RPi2
>>>>>
>>> v1.1 (so: armv7) (I'll be testing this case.)
>>> v1.2 (so: aarch64 --but could also be used via armv7)
>>>
>>>
>>>>> . . .
>>>>> The layout of the disk on the boot partition is thus:
>>>>> root@NewFS:/mnt # ls -la
>>>>> total 12679
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16384 Dec 31 1979 .
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 35 root wheel 42 Jan 20 10:16 ..
>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4096 Feb 13 11:09 EFI
>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 709 Feb 13 11:09 README
>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 26745 Feb 13 11:09 bcm2709-rpi-2-b.dtb
>>>>>
>>> So: armv7 style.
>> Yes.  I didn't think I COULD build for aarch64 on the Pi2.... that will work?
> Which type of RPi2? There is more than one.
>
> I've access to:
>
> a RPi2B v1.1 (Cortex-A7, so armv7 only)
> and:
> a RPi2B v1.2 (Cortex-A72, so aarch64 but also capable of armv7 use)

I have a bunch of v1.1s out there so they're armv7.   Not going away 
anytime soon given the number of them in the field..... :-)

I didn't think aarch64 would work.... and won't on those.  Its fine on 
the Pi3s, of course.

-- 
Karl Denninger
karl@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/