From nobody Mon Jul 17 21:35:36 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4R4b3b5nq5z4nSQ0 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 21:35:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from mail.nrtc.syn-alias.com (mail.nrtc.syn-alias.com [129.213.214.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4R4b3Z40XPz3Hct for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 21:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=peak.org header.s=synacor-nrtc header.b=FB9jcibz; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carlj@peak.org designates 129.213.214.220 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carlj@peak.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=peak.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=peak.org; s=synacor-nrtc; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@peak.org; t=1689629737; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=SdvW4Kuu0GaAJJ4PcsCz5ap4zVE=; b=FB9jcibzFlUN31KpyB9ZfZYj7X7XpDZQGhbHICjCYuSlLfznEOZJb+TQVn8tBuvr oRAJRghHpktBa+GnE6ton7K+YvYEybWqf+7mrqqYi2njAYyJs2b61acxbBksGPa0 O+NqlpNthnMbnxBkVxhk9J8dNPoF8JFWWDGtiL9EkdC+J2iYql1DgFmuNimTqrRb bBCpke0seRIXVeTRzZN6GZjfJOwq+bjrfoGyH8JbP0buW5c1Bz5NPivhf53FycCq Kl6RAgVAq/bDuiWIjjYlNPH1JTEVwnTRaGZX+EzOcwF5QAtV7HZnoeKqDe8nX6Fp IUwQWahmsLZva70Kb+AaOA==; X-Authed-Username: Y2FybGpAcGVhay5vcmc= Received: from [208.79.251.72] ([208.79.251.72:39759] helo=bay.localnet) by mail.peak.org (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 4.4.0.19839 r(msys-ecelerity:tags/4.4.0.0^0)) with ESMTPA id 0C/4A-26575-924B5B46; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:35:37 -0400 Received: from carlj by bay.localnet with local (Exim 4.96 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1qLVsW-000AvK-08 for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:35:36 -0700 From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No packages lately for arm64? References: <86r0p6v8o4.fsf@bay.localnet> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:35:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Mark Millard's message of "Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:14:19 -0700") Message-ID: <86edl6uspj.fsf@bay.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (berkeley-unix) List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Vade-Verdict: clean X-Vade-Analysis-1: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrgeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgv X-Vade-Analysis-2: mecuufgjpfetvefqtfdppfftvfevpdfgpfggqdfptffvvedpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt X-Vade-Analysis-3: udenucenucfjughrpefhvffufhffjgfkfgggtgesthdttddttdertdenucfhrhhomhepvegrrhhlucfl X-Vade-Analysis-4: ohhhnhhsohhnuceotggrrhhljhesphgvrghkrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekieehgfej X-Vade-Analysis-5: jeevhfdvjeettddutdeugeeuueevfeekgeejleejkeduheejhfffudenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggv X-Vade-Analysis-6: sghsugdrohhrghenucfkphepvddtkedrjeelrddvhedurdejvdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-Vade-Analysis-7: necurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedvtdekrdejledrvdehuddrjedvpdhhvghlohepsggrhidrlhhotggr X-Vade-Analysis-8: lhhnvghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheptggrrhhljhesphgvrghkrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepfhhrvggv X-Vade-Analysis-9: sghsugdqrghrmhesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghdpmhhtrghhohhsthepshhmthhptddurdhnrhhttgdr X-Vade-Analysis-10: vghmrghilhdqrghshhdurdhshihntgdrlhgrnhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpihhspghnrgepthhr X-Vade-Analysis-11: uhgvpdgruhhthhgpuhhsvghrpegtrghrlhhjsehpvggrkhdrohhrgh X-Vade-Client: NRTC X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[peak.org,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[peak.org:s=synacor-nrtc]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:129.213.214.220]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[129.213.214.220:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:31898, ipnet:129.213.208.0/21, country:US]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[peak.org:+]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[peak.org:dkim]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[129.213.214.220:from] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4R4b3Z40XPz3Hct X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Mark Millard writes: > On Jul 17, 2023, at 08:50, Carl Johnson wrote: > >> Hello, >> I have been watching for packages for the new quarterly port builds, but >> I haven't seen anything yet. I already update my amd64 system several >> days ago, but nothing has shown yet for arm64. I checked my logs and I >> installed security updates last month, but there haven't been any for >> the last couple of weeks. When I run pkg update, I just get the >> following: >> >> # pkg update >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up to date. >> All repositories are up to date. >> >> I have compared some package versions to my amd64 system and the arm64 >> packages are definitely out of date. I am running FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE >> and all pkg configuration files are the original defaults. Is there >> some web site I could look at to see the build status for packages? > > There were major problems with pkg and its performance and resource > use in an update. Official builds for latest were stopped and > restarted multiple times as pkg was updated to try to get past the > issues. > > On 2023-Jul-13 9 builds were started, each on a separate server, each > with 25000+ ports to build. None were quarterly. Looks like 3 > are still not done, one being for arm64 on ampere2. The other of > the 9 build servers are off doing other builds now. 131releng-armv7 > started building on ampere3 but is not quarterly. It has 26000+ ports > to build. > > But 131arm64's quarterly is building on ampere1 and has 12000+ of > 25000+ to go. > > These notes do not cover distribution of built packages to the > distribution servers. That adds more time after the builds and > the status is not as easy to find. > > I used https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/?all=1&type=package to gather > some of the details presented. Mark, Thanks for the information. I have bookmarked that so I can look it up myself in the future. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org