Re: detecting qemu/HVF on Apple M1 silicon
- In reply to: Ronald Klop : "Re: detecting qemu/HVF on Apple M1 silicon"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:48:10 UTC
Ronald Klop wrote this message on Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:24 +0100: > Van: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> > Datum: dinsdag, 14 februari 2023 09:05 > Aan: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org > Onderwerp: detecting qemu/HVF on Apple M1 silicon > > > > I managed to get FreeBSD running via qemu on Apple M1 silicon, but out > > of the box vm detection isn't working causing hz to be set to 1000, and > > causing lots of cpu usage to happen. > > > > What are the recommended ways to detect this, so we can get vm_guest set? > > > > A little poking around, shows that there's an ACPI device that is > > promising: > > Device (FWCF) > > { > > Name (_HID, "QEMU0002") // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_STA, 0x0B) // _STA: Status > > Name (_CCA, One) // _CCA: Cache Coherency Attribute > > Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () // _CRS: Current Resource Settings > > { > > Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite, > > 0x09020000, // Address Base > > 0x00000018, // Address Length > > ) > > }) > > } > > > > Here's a complete list of _HID's: > > # acpidump -d | grep _HID | sort -u > > Name (_HID, "PNP0C02" /* PNP Motherboard Resources */) // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_HID, "PNP0C0F" /* PCI Interrupt Link Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_HID, "ACPI0007" /* Processor Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_HID, "ACPI0013" /* Generic Event Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_HID, "ARMH0011") // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_HID, "LNRO0005") // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_HID, "PNP0A08" /* PCI Express Bus */) // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_HID, "PNP0C0C" /* Power Button Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID > > Name (_HID, "QEMU0002") // _HID: Hardware ID > > > > There's also the usual virtio devices as well. > > # pciconf -l > > hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x060000 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x1b36 device=0x0008 subvendor=0x1af4 subdevice=0x1100 > > virtio_pci0@pci0:0:1:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x1af4 device=0x1000 subvendor=0x1af4 subdevice=0x0001 > > virtio_pci1@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x038000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x1af4 device=0x1050 subvendor=0x1af4 subdevice=0x1100 > > xhci0@pci0:0:3:0: class=0x0c0330 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x1b36 device=0x000d subvendor=0x1af4 subdevice=0x1100 > > none0@pci0:0:4:0: class=0x040300 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x2668 subvendor=0x1af4 subdevice=0x1100 > > virtio_pci2@pci0:0:5:0: class=0x010000 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x1af4 device=0x1001 subvendor=0x1af4 subdevice=0x0002 > > I'm using UTM as a wrapper around qemu. This gives me the following in dmesg which might be a good hint. > acpi0: <BOCHS BXPC> > > "BOCHS" is also in the output of kenv. > > Although I'm not sure if this is a good indicator for qemu. Yeah, I saw that as well, and I don't believe that is a good indicator, because BOCHS is probably from the x86 emulator project. I did do some additional research after I sent the email, and HyperV uses the FADT acpi table, and it does look like qemu has code to generate the FADT table w/ QEMU as the hypervisor string, but for some reason the HVF code isn't triggering the generation of the FADT table. This seems like a promising way to detect it. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."