Re: firefox broken on arm64

On 03.12.2023 11.59, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03.12.2023 09.38, void wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 08:34:21AM +0100, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Just build firefox-esr-115.5.0_1,1  and firefox-116.0.3_1,2 the first 
>>> runs with aslr disabled, the latter signals 4.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on what is going on are appreciated.
>>
>> What's the uname -aKU ?
> 
> FreeBSD generic 14.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE #0 
> releng/14.0-n265380-f9716eee8ab4: Fri Nov 10 09:12:14 UTC 2023 
> root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC 
> arm64 1400097 1400097
> 
>   did you build from ports or poudriere?
>  From ports.
> 
> If the
>> latter, what's the /etc/make.conf contain?
>>
>> Please post sysctl -a | grep aslr
>>
> 
> kern.elf32.aslr.shared_page: 0
> kern.elf32.aslr.stack: 1
> kern.elf32.aslr.honor_sbrk: 0
> kern.elf32.aslr.pie_enable: 0
> kern.elf32.aslr.enable: 0
> kern.elf64.aslr.shared_page: 1
> kern.elf64.aslr.stack: 1
> kern.elf64.aslr.honor_sbrk: 0
> kern.elf64.aslr.pie_enable: 1
> kern.elf64.aslr.enable: 1
> vm.aslr_restarts: 256
> 
> I did the esr build to test the build setup, since also the pkg in the 
> official pkg repo behaves the same i.e the one before 115.5 since 115.5 
> did not hit the pkg repo yet, which works without aslr (set by 
> proccontrol) So unless 116 introduces something which requires sysctl 
> changes for the building tool chain while building my test should be valid.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> /jsm
> 
> 
Hi
Just FYI
I have managed to cross-compile firefox115-esr on amd64 to aaarhc64 so 
that takes me ~20 min compute time to compile as opposed to 5-7 hours on 
my arm boards... I think it broke somewhere between 115 and 116, but now 
bisecting is doable to the extend the port patches allows. Can someone 
btw tell me hove the libwebrtc patches are generated..?