From nobody Tue Aug 22 16:44:40 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RVZvT1ZR3z4r7bm; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com (mail-lj1-f180.google.com [209.85.208.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RVZvS3nDlz4cTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com; dmarc=none Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bcc187e0b5so33660251fa.1; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:44:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692722690; x=1693327490; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=cW2w/vAIAQlZmSluba6IIQJDOiFZqW07+F8IpNr2rHc=; b=MHihtwzkzbwCJWkWUd4qwzVONjBgA7YHjTo6hJBafJ2Z1Ei/iohxpVXKOXyRtkgXkC zJqxq8OkNxyFg+dRG6TJIX5QAYbtfGv0eLu5TKnoOyW5Vtuhd2mbBFfaK3DVNngDPZCf SjKay3jeWc2HLEd6NnrJZ8z6swuc8btf/CApcl4HV5ZC9r4leyYl7oJqgPUqlXnkjw60 y7yqJZBnydta8mUByU4yLUIu1VY2reslcfhEj57gndUKUUZ2QWTHt8SbLaiX5iBdB441 ZB5m7+5hruOwE31giBCozOcY/JWDGWRGAEaIU25yeldMVAyMYm22kW8ZiPWs7bHx7R7l 7dfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwwkK4L5K3v2dOPGfebsUKCN7j2DynyCAbuTtPYQdbxzjRfPBff yYgubFn9croHmVsKoQS88Oc7c3HPTeCaF2LNkHQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFRjPhjV0DL3olZqbELiFN+fjW0qRjFUdJbHRIK3+GjyI96qJZhFiIaJvQrcq+huRtGRYD575Zc/F2qRiSo1OA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:720e:0:b0:2bb:b56b:f67e with SMTP id n14-20020a2e720e000000b002bbb56bf67emr6102274ljc.19.1692722690381; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:44:50 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:44:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: aarch64 buildworld via aarch64-gcc12 got multiple: "undefined reference to `__aarch64_ldadd4_sync'" To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm , FreeBSD Toolchain Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.15 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.972]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.82)[0.823]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org,freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[carpeddiem]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.180:from]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.180:from] X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RVZvS3nDlz4cTP On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 22:04, Ed Maste wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 04:27, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > Are both tier 1 architectures intended to be ARCH-gcc12 > > buildable? I decided to try an aarch64-gcc12 since the > > amd64-gcc12 builds of main shown on ci.freebsd.org are > > generally finishing these days. > > amd64-gcc12 is currently broken, after the GoogleTest update, and > arm64-gcc12 is still broken with the error you reported. FWIW amd64-gcc12 is green again. The arm64-gcc12's is due to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63483.