From nobody Sat Aug 12 21:57:59 2023
X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RNZKR1qFCz4TrLy
	for <freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 21:58:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net)
Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified))
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RNZKQ5nGcz4T6M
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 21:58:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.zefox.net (8.17.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 37CLw0oi019567
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net)
Received: (from fbsd@localhost)
	by www.zefox.net (8.17.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 37CLw0Ob019566;
	Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fbsd)
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:57:59 -0700
From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: alpha-1 armv7 git failed: fatal: pack is corrupted (SHA1
 mismatch)
Message-ID: <ZNgAZ6P1yrCla+Tz@www.zefox.net>
References: <ZNfQUUE3hlt6KEDF@www.zefox.net>
 <8DCC324C-966C-45DF-88F6-A442E348D4AA@yahoo.com>
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-arm+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-arm+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8DCC324C-966C-45DF-88F6-A442E348D4AA@yahoo.com>
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RNZKQ5nGcz4T6M
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 02:29:02PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
[huge snip]

> It may be that the problem you had was not local to your machine,
> or even to your local network. Some received byte(s) might well
> have been bad.
> 

It appears that the exact error varies with time. Perhaps I've
simply jumped the gun. The most recent message was
...
Receiving objects: 100% (99626/99626), 314.27 MiB | 959.00 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (21416/21416), done.
fatal: missing blob object '84f2442457380e747af01d49ad567da70f6cfcbb'
fatal: remote did not send all necessary objects

Thanks for writing!

bob prohaska