Re: The import of openzfs vs. armv7: boot crashs
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "The import of openzfs vs. armv7: boot crashs"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 06:55:17 UTC
On Apr 18, 2023, at 15:44, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/d0cbd9feaf5b82130f2e679256c71e0c7413aae9 > > does not seem to cover armv7, just aarch64. (FreeBSD disabled > floating point for both armv7 and aarch64 but that is a > different change than above.) > > I used: > > FreeBSD-14.0-CURRENT-arm-armv7-GENERICSD-20230406-f21faa67ab6b-262010.img.xz > > booted an RPi2B v1.1 and tried (note the KSTACK_PAGES notice and the > "undefined floating point instruction" notice): > > # zpool import > ZFS NOTICE: KSTACK_PAGES is 2 which could result in stack overflow panic! > Please consider adding 'options KSTACK_PAGES=4' to your kernel config > panic: undefined floating point instruction in supervisor mode > cpuid = 2 > time = 1680784610 > KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self() at db_trace_self > pc = 0xc05eb154 lr = 0xc007a688 (db_trace_self_wrapper+0x30) > sp = 0xdd25c480 fp = 0xdd25c598 > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x30 > pc = 0xc007a688 lr = 0xc02eb1b4 (vpanic+0x140) > sp = 0xdd25c5a0 fp = 0xdd25c5c0 > r4 = 0x00000100 r5 = 0x00000000 > r6 = 0xc0736bfc r7 = 0xc0b1aea8 > vpanic() at vpanic+0x140 > pc = 0xc02eb1b4 lr = 0xc02eaf94 (doadump) > sp = 0xdd25c5c8 fp = 0xdd25c5cc > r4 = 0xc0b92210 r5 = 0x00000000 > r6 = 0xc0610ca0 r7 = 0xf4210a0d > r8 = 0xddf32e4c r9 = 0x00000013 > r10 = 0xdd25c6c0 > doadump() at doadump > pc = 0xc02eaf94 lr = 0xc0610eb0 (vfp_new_thread) > sp = 0xdd25c5d4 fp = 0xdd25c638 > r4 = 0xdd25c6c0 r5 = 0xdd25c5cc > r6 = 0xc02eaf94 r10 = 0xdd25c5d4 > vfp_new_thread() at vfp_new_thread > pc = 0xc0610eb0 lr = 0xc060ff84 (undefinedinstruction+0x178) > sp = 0xdd25c640 fp = 0xdd25c6b8 > undefinedinstruction() at undefinedinstruction+0x178 > pc = 0xc060ff84 lr = 0xc05edaa8 (exception_exit) > sp = 0xdd25c6c0 fp = 0xdd25c750 > r4 = 0x20000013 r5 = 0xde45e000 > r6 = 0xdd25c890 r7 = 0xdd25c8b0 > r8 = 0x00000000 r9 = 0x00000000 > r10 = 0xdd25c8c0 > exception_exit() at exception_exit > pc = 0xc05edaa8 lr = 0xddf31f20 (K256) > sp = 0xdd25c750 fp = 0xdd25c750 > r0 = 0xdd25c890 r1 = 0xde45e000 > r2 = 0xde45e400 r3 = 0xddf309fc > r4 = 0x00000400 r5 = 0xde45e000 > r6 = 0xdd25c890 r7 = 0xdd25c8b0 > r8 = 0x00000000 r9 = 0x00000000 > r10 = 0xdd25c8c0 r12 = 0xdd25c7a0 > zfs_sha256_block_neon() at zfs_sha256_block_neon+0x1c > pc = 0xddf32e4c lr = 0xc0946e8c (pcpup) > sp = 0xdd25c758 fp = 0xc0b0aeec > r4 = 0xc0919610 r5 = 0xc0919630 > r6 = 0xc0919618 r7 = 0x642ebce2 > r8 = 0xc0b1b0ec r9 = 0xc0915e88 > r10 = 0xc0b1b0dc > Fatal kernel mode data abort: 'Translation Fault (L1)' on read > trapframe: 0xdd25c330 > FSR=00000005, FAR=95e29398, spsr=200000d3 > r0 =dd25c424, r1 =81000000, r2 =95e29395, r3 =55555555 > r4 =c08ae93c, r5 =00004aa0, r6 =00004aa0, r7 =c08d3e3c > r8 =00000001, r9 =c079567a, r10=0000000b, r11=dd25c3e0 > r12=00000000, ssp=dd25c3c4, slr=00000001, pc =c0610308 > > panic: Fatal abort > . . . (repeats over and over) . . . I probably need to explain the subject line's reference to boot crashes, given the specific crash that I show is not that. I reported a simpler context than booting ZFS media: boot a UFS snapshot then force ZFS to start with no ZFS pools even being present. It is the same simplified type of test that I previously had reported for aarch64 as a simpler/easier test to set up than an actual root on ZFS crash that I had originally gotten for aarch64. The test I present should imply that a boot of, say, a root on ZFS context would crash. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com