Re: [package - 130arm64-default][java/openjdk17] Failed for openjdk17-17.0.2+8.1 in configure
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 08:09:42 UTC
ASLR was turned on by default on -CURRENT. All the java ports are affected if they are built with a -CURRENT system. On 08/05/2022 06:14, Greg Lewis wrote: > > Is the suggestion to put that into the openjdk17 port Makefile? I'll > look for some documentation on this. > > FWIW, the bootstrap just works on the AWS hardware I stand up for > aarch64. Although that is also where I built the bootstrap images. > If someone has some different hardware that would be preferable? > > -- Greg > > On 5/2/22 12:12 AM, Ronald Klop wrote: >> >> *Van:* "Mikaël Urankar" <mikael@FreeBSD.org> >> *Datum:* zondag, 1 mei 2022 17:56 >> *Aan:* Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> >> *Onderwerp:* Re: [package - 130arm64-default][java/openjdk17] Failed >> for openjdk17-17.0.2+8.1 in configure >> >> On 30/04/2022 15:49, Ronald Klop wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Openjdk17 and openjdk13 are failing on 130arm64. >> > >> > This started in March, I don't see a bug report in Bugzilla >> about it. >> > Openjdk17 is a LTS version so it would be nice to have that one >> fixed. > Openjdk13 is deprecated so don't bother about that one >> but mentioning > is because it might be related. >> > >> > Below the openjdk17 log. >> > >> > The build for main-arm64 had the same error: (IPv6:) > >> http://ampere2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/main-arm64-default/p62850d28ca57_s651a887f4e/logs/errors/openjdk17-17.0.2+8.1.log >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ronald. >> >> Hi, >> >> It's similar to >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260187 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for sharing your memory of closed issues! >> >> Would the port need something like this? >> >> ELF_FEATURES= noaslr:bootstrap-openjdk17/bin/java >> >> Maybe with a conditional on aarch64. >> >> Regards, >> Ronald.