Re: panic: data abort in critical section or under mutex (was: Re: panic: Unknown kernel exception 0 esr_el1 2000000 (on 14-CURRENT/aarch64 Feb 28))
- Reply: Dmitry Salychev : "Re: panic: data abort in critical section or under mutex (was: Re: panic: Unknown kernel exception 0 esr_el1 2000000 (on 14-CURRENT/aarch64 Feb 28))"
- In reply to: Mark Johnston : "Re: panic: data abort in critical section or under mutex (was: Re: panic: Unknown kernel exception 0 esr_el1 2000000 (on 14-CURRENT/aarch64 Feb 28))"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:42:04 UTC
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:45:02AM -0500, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 04:25:22PM +0000, Andrew Turner wrote: > > > > > On 7 Mar 2022, at 15:13, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > ... > > > A (the?) problem is that the compiler is treating "pc" as an alias > > > for x18, but the rmlock code assumes that the pcpu pointer is loaded > > > once, as it dereferences "pc" outside of the critical section. On > > > arm64, if a context switch occurs between the store at _rm_rlock+144 and > > > the load at +152, and the thread is migrated to another CPU, then we'll > > > end up using the wrong CPU ID in the rm->rm_writecpus test. > > > > > > I suspect the problem is unique to arm64 as its get_pcpu() > > > implementation is different from the others in that it doesn't use > > > volatile-qualified inline assembly. This has been the case since > > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=63c858a04d56529eddbddf85ad04fc8e99e73762 <https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=63c858a04d56529eddbddf85ad04fc8e99e73762> > > > . > > > > > > I haven't been able to reproduce any crashes running poudriere in an > > > arm64 AWS instance, though. Could you please try the patch below and > > > confirm whether it fixes your panics? I verified that the apparent > > > problem described above is gone with the patch. > > > > Alternatively (or additionally) we could do something like the following. There are only a few MI users of get_pcpu with the main place being in rm locks. > > > > diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/pcpu.h b/sys/arm64/include/pcpu.h > > index 09f6361c651c..59b890e5c2ea 100644 > > --- a/sys/arm64/include/pcpu.h > > +++ b/sys/arm64/include/pcpu.h > > @@ -58,7 +58,14 @@ struct pcpu; > > > > register struct pcpu *pcpup __asm ("x18"); > > > > -#define get_pcpu() pcpup > > +static inline struct pcpu * > > +get_pcpu(void) > > +{ > > + struct pcpu *pcpu; > > + > > + __asm __volatile("mov %0, x18" : "=&r"(pcpu)); > > + return (pcpu); > > +} > > > > static inline struct thread * > > get_curthread(void) > > Indeed, I think this is probably the best solution. Just for fun I tried the patch on a Pi3 running -current, updated a day or two prior. The patch applied, compiled and seemed to run acceptably, but when I left a -j2 -DWITH_META_MODE buildworld running it crashed overnight, reporting login: panic: rm_rlock: recursed on non-recursive rmlock sysctl lock @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:193 cpuid = 0 time = 1646720264 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self() at db_trace_self db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x30 vpanic() at vpanic+0x174 panic() at panic+0x44 _rm_rlock_debug() at _rm_rlock_debug+0x214 sysctl_root_handler_locked() at sysctl_root_handler_locked+0x140 sysctl_root() at sysctl_root+0x1ac userland_sysctl() at userland_sysctl+0x140 sys___sysctl() at sys___sysctl+0x68 do_el0_sync() at do_el0_sync+0x520 handle_el0_sync() at handle_el0_sync+0x40 --- exception, esr 0x56000000 KDB: enter: panic [ thread pid 869 tid 100091 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x44: undefined f902011f I tried typing bt at the debugger prompt but got no more output. I've put the buildworld log file at http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/crashes/20220307/ Hope this is of some use.... bob prohaska