Re: 13.1R problems on Pi3
- Reply: bob prohaska : "Re: 13.1R problems on Pi3"
- In reply to: bob prohaska : "Re: 13.1R problems on Pi3"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 16:17:15 UTC
On 7/4/2022 11:28, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 10:36:35PM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: >> This is crossbuilt but... >> >> $ uname -v >> FreeBSD 13.1-STABLE #0 stable/13-n250683-e44e611e31c: Fri May?? 6 10:47:17 >> EDT 2022karl@NewFS.denninger.net:/work/OBJ/ARM64-13/obj/work/CrossBuild-13.1STABLE/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC >> >> $ uptime >> 10:27PM?? up 49 days,?? 7:10, 1 user, load averages: 0.14, 0.15, 0.13 >> >> Ping both for Ipv4 and v6 (along with everything else) works fine. > > That makes it unlikely the omission of DHCP services on my > machines accounts of lack of ping and ssh response. > > Can any sense be made of the few ping responses obtained when ntp > is coming up? It's looks as if something happens after ntp runs > that blocks subsequent network traffic, but why starting an outbound > ping should partly unblock things is obscure to me. Yes. The odds are reasonably high that there is confusion as to which MAC address maps to which device. This implies there's a loop between the two switches (e.g. there is more than one way for packets to get into and out of each said switch to the other) or the two devices are claiming the same MAC address and thus when each "speaks" and performs ARP it "grabs" the map which works until the next one pipes up and it grabs it. Each interface device from the factory is supposed to have a unique MAC address. This can, for most interfaces, be overridden (modern Android phones "randomize" it if told to as a "security" measure) but for obvious reasons doing that can lead to problems. Collisions where multiple devices are using the same MAC will lead to exactly the sort of thing you're seeing because the switch is sending the packets to the wrong place. I've got a decent number of Pis of everything back to the "2" here and most of the time several of them are on my network at once. I've not seen this problem but I wouldn't exclude that both are claiming the same MAC and, if so, that's what's causing the problem. Check here: $ ifconfig ue0 ue0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80009<RXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE> _*ether b8:27:eb:4e:88:64*_ inet 192.168.10.214 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255 inet6 fe80::ba27:ebff:fe4e:8864%ue0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet6 2600:6c5d:5d01:8600:ba27:ebff:fe4e:8864 prefixlen 64 autoconf media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active nd6 options=23<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> That MUST be unique on your LAN; the prefix (first three octets) is a vendor code /*and the last three should never be duplicated by a vendor. */If you are not setting it in /etc/rc.conf or elsewhere and there /are /duplicates then a very bad thing happened when those units were manufactured -- set one of them to something else. -- Karl Denninger karl@denninger.net /The Market Ticker/ /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/