Re: Troubles building world on stable/13
- Reply: bob prohaska : "Re: Troubles building world on stable/13"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: Troubles building world on stable/13"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:29:08 UTC
On 2022-Jan-24, at 10:26, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 2022-Jan-24, at 08:54, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:14:32PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >>>> On 2022-Jan-20, at 22:00, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> It does no good for me since I do not get a failure, >>> but you might try (instead of exectuing the .sh file) >>> (I used \'s to split the huge line): >>> >>> lldb -- "/usr/bin/c++" "-cc1" "-triple" "aarch64-unknown-freebsd13.0" "-emit-obj" "--mrelax-relocations" \ >>> "-disable-free" "-disable-llvm-verifier" "-discard-value-names" "-main-file-name" "gmock_main.cc" \ >>> "-mrelocation-model" "static" "-mframe-pointer=non-leaf" "-fno-rounding-math" "-mconstructor-aliases" \ >>> "-munwind-tables" "-target-cpu" "generic" "-target-feature" "+neon" "-target-abi" "aapcs" \ >>> "-fallow-half-arguments-and-returns" "-debug-info-kind=standalone" "-dwarf-version=4" \ >>> "-debugger-tuning=gdb" \ >>> "-fcoverage-compilation-dir=/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/lib/googletest/gmock_main" \ >>> "-O2" "-Wno-format-zero-length" "-Wsystem-headers" "-Werror" "-Wall" "-Wno-format-y2k" "-W" \ >>> "-Wno-unused-parameter" "-Wpointer-arith" "-Wreturn-type" "-Wcast-qual" "-Wwrite-strings" "-Wswitch" \ >>> "-Wshadow" "-Wunused-parameter" "-Wcast-align" "-Wchar-subscripts" "-Wredundant-decls" \ >>> "-Wmissing-variable-declarations" "-Wno-empty-body" "-Wno-string-plus-int" "-Wno-unused-const-variable" \ >>> "-Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable" "-Wno-deprecated-declarations" "-Wno-deprecated-copy" \ >>> "-Wno-c++11-extensions" "-std=c++11" "-fdeprecated-macro" \ >>> "-fdebug-compilation-dir=/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/lib/googletest/gmock_main" \ >>> "-ferror-limit" "19" "-stack-protector" "2" "-fno-signed-char" "-fgnuc-version=4.2.1" \ >>> "-fcxx-exceptions" "-fexceptions" "-vectorize-loops" "-vectorize-slp" "-faddrsig" \ >>> "-D__GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM=1" "-x" "c++" "gmock_main-f5c28a.cpp" >>> >>> and then "run" at the (lldb) prompt. It might stop and let you >>> get a backtrace (bt command) in addition to whatever it reports >>> about the stoppage. >> >> That seems to have worked, to some extent. Here's the transcript, in single-user mode: >> >> root@pelorus:/usr/src # >> root@pelorus:/usr/src # lldb -- "/usr/bin/c++" "-cc1" "-triple" "aarch64-unknown-freebsd13.0" "-emit-obj" "--mrelax-relocations" \ >>> . . . >>> "-fcxx-exceptions" "-fexceptions" "-vectorize-loops" "-vectorize-slp" "-faddrsig" \ >>> "-D__GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM=1" "-x" "c++" "gmock_main-f5c28a.cpp" >> (lldb) target create "/usr/bin/c++" >> >> Current executable set to '/usr/bin/c++' (aarch64). >> (lldb) settings set -- target.run-args "-cc1" . . . "c++" "gmock_main-f5c28a.cpp" >> (lldb) >> (lldb) run >> Process 58516 launched: '/usr/bin/c++' (aarch64) >> Process 58516 stopped >> * thread #1, name = 'c++', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: invalid address (fault address: 0x1) >> frame #0: 0x0000000002df7444 c++`::ProcessDeclAttributeList() [inlined] getPointer at PointerIntPair.h:59:58 >> 56 >> 57 explicit PointerIntPair(PointerTy PtrVal) { initWithPointer(PtrVal); } >> 58 >> -> 59 PointerTy getPointer() const { return Info::getPointer(Value); } >> 60 >> 61 IntType getInt() const { return (IntType)Info::getInt(Value); } >> 62 >> (lldb) bt >> * thread #1, name = 'c++', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: invalid address (fault address: 0x1) >> * frame #0: 0x0000000002df7444 c++`::ProcessDeclAttributeList() [inlined] getPointer at PointerIntPair.h:59:58 >> frame #1: 0x0000000002df7444 c++`::ProcessDeclAttributeList() [inlined] isNull at PointerUnion.h:172:43 >> frame #2: 0x0000000002df7444 c++`::ProcessDeclAttributeList() [inlined] empty at TinyPtrVector.h:166:13 >> frame #3: 0x0000000002df7444 c++`::ProcessDeclAttributeList() [inlined] empty at ParsedAttr.h:873:40 >> frame #4: 0x0000000002df7444 c++`::ProcessDeclAttributeList() at SemaDeclAttr.cpp:8449:16 >> frame #5: 0x000000000317e784 c++`::ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization() at SemaTemplate.cpp:8537:3 >> (lldb) > > To look at the different frames: > > (lldb) up 1 > (lldb) bt > . . . (output) . . . > (lldb) up 1 > (lldb) bt > . . . (output) . . . > > and so on until #5 has been displayed. > >> [repeated bt commands seem to duplicate the same output] >> >> I can't make much sense of it, but perhaps others can. It does look >> as if I've somehow corrupted c++. Is there some way to bootstrap >> past the defect? All the clean targets I've tried (clean, cleandir, >> cleanworld, rm -rf /usr/obj, cleandepend) seem to have no effect, >> singly and in combination. >> >> Is it possible to simply delete /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project and >> let git reconstruct it, then force a compiler rebuild somwhow? > > Using git status should report on any files that do not > match what is in .git . In my context for main [so: 14] > that would be: > > # git -C /usr/main-src status > . . . (output --if any) . . . > > You would likely need /usr/src instead. > > Using git diff would show the specific differences. In my > context for main [so: 14] that would look like (if no > differences were found): > > # git -C /usr/main-src diff > . . . (output --if any) . . . > > You would likely need /usr/src . > > If these do not show anything, the source code is not > likely to be the problem. > That last is a bad wording on my part: corrupted source code is not likely to be the problem. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com