Re: Troubles building world on stable/13
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: Troubles building world on stable/13"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: Troubles building world on stable/13"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 01:51:49 UTC
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:18:07PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2022-Feb-2, at 14:32, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: > > > The latest Pi3 single-user -j1 buildworld stopped with clang error 139. > > Running the .sh and .cpp files produced an error. The .sh was > > re-run under lldb and backtraced. > > I'll see if I can find any interesting information based on > the "fault address: 0x5" and source code related to the > backtrace reporting . > > > The output is at > > http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/clang_trouble/20220202/lldb_session > > along with the buildworld log and related files in the same directory. > > Your 20220202/readme reports: > > QUOTE > The first attempt to run lldb-gtest-all-fe760c.sh finished with exit > code zero. A subsequent try produced the expected output reported > here in lldb_session. > END QUOTE > > (You had also reported (off list) a recent prior failure where the > .sh/.cpp pair did not repeat the failure when you tired it.) > > Well: > > http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/clang_trouble/20220202/gtest-all-fe760c.o > > seems to be a possibly valid compile result to go along with the > run (under lldb) that finished normally (exit code zero). > > I can not see the dates/times on the files over the web interface. > Can you report the output of something like a > > # ls -Tla Done and added to the web directory as file_dates: root@pelorus:/usr/src # ls -Tla *76* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Feb 2 13:52:42 2022 gtest-all-fe760c-d2733764.o.tmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7339473 Feb 2 13:18:34 2022 gtest-all-fe760c.cpp -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5246192 Feb 2 13:48:41 2022 gtest-all-fe760c.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4527 Feb 2 13:18:34 2022 gtest-all-fe760c.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1448 Feb 2 13:35:26 2022 lldb-gtest-all-fe760c.sh > > We will see if I notice anything intersting looking at > source code related to the frames of the backtrace for > the lldb based failure reporting. > > The variable results for the (lldb) .sh/.cpp runs for the > same file pair suggests possibilities like race conditions, > use of uninitialized memory, use of deallocated-and-reused > memory (now in-use for something else), flaky hardware. > > (That failure only sometimes happened with the .sh/cpp > pair means that no processing of include files was involved: > the .cpp of the pair is self contained.) > > I'll note that the buildworld.log 's : > > 1. /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/private/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h:899:21: current parser token '{' > 2. /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/tmp/usr/include/private/gtest/internal/gtest-type-util.h:58:1: parsing namespace 'testing' > > is the exact same places in the original source code > as was reported in other such logs for failures while > processing gtest-all.cc . > > > Not sure what to try next. It is possible to build kernel-toolchain and > > new kernels, > > kernel-toolchain builds a subset of the toolchain that > buildworld builds. I'm unsure if the buildworld > completed building what kernel-toolchain builds or not. > > > if that might be useful. > > For now, I need to explore source code. > Ok, I'll refrain from idle tampering. > > At present the machine reports > > bob@pelorus:/usr/src % uname -apKU > > FreeBSD pelorus.zefox.org 13.0-STABLE FreeBSD 13.0-STABLE #0 stable/13-n249120-dee0854a009: Sat Jan 22 23:32:23 PST 2022 bob@pelorus.zefox.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC arm64 aarch64 1300525 1300523 > > Thanks for the reference to stable/13 's dee0854a009 . > > (This was still the "boot -s" single user context for > the testing. Note is for anyone reading this.) > > FYI: the variable result makes the corrupted-block > hypothesis less likely. You have seen the failure via > the original files and via the .cpp of the .sh/.cpp > pair. You appear to have had a successful build > with the .cpp pair --and an unsuccessful one. Also > no stage under lldb reported illegal instructions or > the like. > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > >