Re: Looks like the arm 20220805 snapshots are still odd, so probably kern.geom.part.mbr.enforce_chs=0 was still in use

From: Dr. Rolf Jansen <freebsd-rj_at_cyclaero.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 21:51:02 UTC
> Am 07.08.2022 um 16:50 schrieb Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>:
> 
> On 2022-Aug-7, at 12:32, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> Correct, it was set to “0” for these builds.
>> 
>> I honestly do not have any idea where the problems you are seeing are creeping in.
>> 
>> Should it be set back to “1”?  I’m not sure how to proceed otherwise.
> 
> My guess is that if the release/tools/arm.subr line:
> 
>              chroot ${CHROOTDIR} gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -a 64k ${mddev}s2
> 
> was instead (note the added -b use):
> 
>              chroot ${CHROOTDIR} gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -b 64k -a 64k ${mddev}s2
> 
> then the line:
> 
>              chroot ${CHROOTDIR} newfs -U -L rootfs /dev/${mddev}s2a
> 
> would work as expected and things would still be aligned:
> no aliasing of BSD vs. freebsd-ufs. (In part this is by
> prior steps already having achieved alignment of BSD.)

From a strict mathematical stand point of view, -a is not necessary when using -b with an aligned value.

Personally I don’t use the -a option of gpart anymore since it started to do funny magics in front of face. If I remember correct, gpart of the FreeBSD 9.x-RELEASES was still OK (or was it 8?). Nowadays, I align all my storage media by employing -b with a reasonable value.

Best regards

Rolf