From nobody Fri Oct 22 20:56:08 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994BA18056CF for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roboman7811@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hbc8B6fWqz3DVT; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roboman7811@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id d15so5743359qkj.10; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QnT9eLzkG+cyRB1zKtHaxQ8oM/gWL++56wpdVojFvBE=; b=JNc7kt0ndg2yaxHSN/NUUyPvR/gTfv64ehWuWup5MR0WWykRCett5bf6Z4jWCz21YS kVp0SSCAkNROuJk+DnYd2kytnmCF9eBN+qMDCmR1FGS9ejO/QRkxiQAlzULgH7MbZ9Ep Q+k/Jb3kzkkNPzGztYP8aW1+sYqd0v7R5hMNrwflAUgTKoDb/x/ekGWHYFliLsshOMte Wbkrp0HQAhbnch0cQdnczNWoCuArqeIFK8X9TlThYq5OVEMU/ZNIS6KqjXZrG3m5axxK QsMfSU3YsrqEPm/nsUSe+V5B/DSU5904eZ6i2opvvvPGWwHXS1ni1kx5w6nXqfV/BZP1 oHiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QnT9eLzkG+cyRB1zKtHaxQ8oM/gWL++56wpdVojFvBE=; b=IoOtGXQ8HjymnmzpcMTrskj630L7EDplVLlO8G08RS6CanJb5N0Ttvz+FqCI2PTSoE +YNa8QvdlG0DQ4HE1LQQv7CUUQSrQiq5rG8suhytkx3aIkTIY3dy/Ufsfkg7oYkTBj6r nyq/c7ssuLfk+YjHj7L8+6Ct2itIipote3BqUu7ah/aNrlAKG9fotK9ECGx5TD22KCDU c+1tcgq/8J4QewsIYP+UhTt4mxQ49InsZPYCzJppUF64uIYIx0Gfe5PkT7XO032HMVFr cpNmC6blMozoBFJKk62b6wXzfWeJha7rTsRQ25dIq/naqq2EmdXpvjk8etaR87ecrjw+ CSew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XOe3KvnyMJDB5U3s/N4S+Dy/WB5aFX+ygK7VzXFwx1pCzMhcH qmfkZlLb3VIHy6BMBiDlCnQ+YtN7BfiN/ylv X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwA1W7wo/Lbp2/xrI74cNnpjOY0CCdzaibtpI1swWnR2upmSJHzUQt9Ox0zLuL8pMUOZJd1jg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:2e87:: with SMTP id u129mr2077988qkh.208.1634936170031; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PI4.lan ([74.215.23.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m18sm4941947qtk.61.2021.10.22.13.56.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53632ea44a83cb8e223d439eb06bea2705f1e0bb.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Rock64 1Gb Ethernet not working, 100 MB okay From: roboman To: Adriaan de Groot , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 16:56:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2902939.hHqAuc6tWs@beastie.bionicmutton.org> References: <2902939.hHqAuc6tWs@beastie.bionicmutton.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hbc8B6fWqz3DVT X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Thanks Ade, I did find those threads during my research into the problem. What has me reaching-out to FreeBSD-ARM is that ethernet works 100% reliable on Armbian/Diet-Pi. This led me to suspect a kernel overlay to band-aid the hardware problem *might* exist. If any software solution existed, I assumed this was the audience who would know for- sure. -Jeff On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 20:35 +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Friday, 22 October 2021 08:22:21 CEST roboman wrote: > > > One is running 13-Release at 1GB and is operating 100% stable @ 1Gb > > as > > a NFS server w/several active clients. > > > > Three fail to connect either via static or DHCP @ 1 Gb. > > There was a lengthy thread "Rock64 flaky ethernet?" back in May on > this list. > Yout can find blog-posts about it -- not necessarily FreeBSD-related > though -- > at places like > https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=7545 > > https://sanisimov.com/2019/08/fixing-rock64-v2-gigabit-ethernet/ > > I was unsuccessful at finding the "right" timings to improve > performance and > gave up on that particular board (not Rock64 overall, just the > specific one on > my desk). > > [ade]