From nobody Thu Nov 04 14:50:53 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B3718388E4; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HlRQw0jJMz4Vqd; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BC53201C3B; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:50:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Nov 2021 10:50:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=jSTSUWYcRvhIqLDFFXk7+wNZiu7 YbR4KcQqW+FKxc4s=; b=i3T/weuT6//U48qOEuq1BroEfp0WM8HuUvMavqTvalK wCkBB/YwLbNcnUiH77CpMwCK4fMEVmGVK0XSnkoK77n8oyY/QpzthG47pceYSfOl 8cHGPJkMBv273UhX6PB/mT4cJ1MwGhq84OFepm49bR7BoAYUJehvJQ84LeCxhzG2 Ic41fLauHGUg2drQ+W4Ans+HFqRcJK9s5CZCeRXNI/0nJYo4idLi2jn1HZ0du0d0 hDmzu4i8gYWoUcEVLcgzAwZP7H1Bz/VdNe40UvOK35bNqQo/0/Bx2+WraH2gr3zw G8QcIbtjDY7wH2IT47lIb/0OE3KxjdoWBaAJaAlJlJA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=jSTSUW YcRvhIqLDFFXk7+wNZiu7YbR4KcQqW+FKxc4s=; b=FhiYt56RaJtvg/Xxzy9UZL FYb5P57+r2/2eVSnwtsPIV6/LTqa7SvLNps/FfV+EzbXvkDwaxXYRnarYUL/0yGR Wszv/kmvX3DLEeZoGHjhhS0QMz1b/oRJc6lzDyOoFUHBINhHZcgXOVVT7cXIjmid nUkf4pXyXyjgJ6gu8PQlhVS5L3w4VGqJkGeHWhX+7SbeAdbftmAHmulg+LEG4s9o pMquplp6Ju+34CX33RSPBTbAzfv9wf6s5PLgsraJhsw901WvMyWRUJb93CX8rynJ rm77YGGgQ0ZanSuffLM2HrVZ95PIzCvNm76YQkscnob18EHjM+d2ckqFYm7Hhc4g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrtdeggdeigecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderre dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshcuoehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshesiiih gihsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdehiefgvddufeekkedvtdefvdettd dtkeduvdegveelffdtkeffudejvdfhudetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:50:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:50:53 +0000 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 14: Poll armv6 deprecated or removed Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VNmVAG70LQrkNslD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HlRQw0jJMz4Vqd X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm1 header.b="i3T/weuT"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=FhiYt56R; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net has no SPF policy when checking 64.147.123.24) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[64.147.123.24:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.24:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --VNmVAG70LQrkNslD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:52:19AM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: >FreeBSD wants any audience to help support the features they demand. Since >this particular audience has not, what may cause it to in the future? Not a >rhetorical question nor a vote for removing, this is a perennial problem in >open source and I am curious how you think this works so I can incorporate >it into my opinion. Maybe the audience isn't demanding? It doesn't mean the audience isn't there. perl and python and shell scripting work fine on these boards.=20 Issues with these things would I guess be taken up with those maintainers.= =20 The hardware is very stable. I'd expect that a lot more users might pipe=20 up if their freebsd os needed updating for some newer python only to find= =20 it couldn't be updated anymore. The first of those to pipe up i'd guess=20 be those with boards that have an internet-facing connection, as the=20 pressure to keep fully updated is a lot less within a firewalled LAN. OpenBSD immediately after install has an email on the system giving a method to send in a dmesg. I don't know if it gives them a handle on the number of users and what their hardware is, but it's better than nothing at all, which is where FreeBSD is. Although there is a port called sysutils/hw-probe, one needs to know about it first. It's not in base. For armv6 in particular though, I've not heard of any reason justifying *why* getting rid of it. At least if it's in base we can compile ports for it ourselves. mips/mips64 stopped because the working group stopped working with it, fair enough. This isn't the case with armv6. It might be helpful looking from another viewpoint - why is armv6 a tier1 architecture on NetBSD? --=20 J. --VNmVAG70LQrkNslD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAmGD80QACgkQs8o7QhFz NAXvtRAAlGjqCo2PZ5AO1zAbguY5HvD3Cwf3X1tDVztTkwOtrslKgLJHS156q1To UMYw2lCwuSJAXiyD97Kgdns+fUGcVBuMjBEWD4xin5UBqvoNzLCrk9zLJgwv2nAB /Jgdazfelln3Nx4L15da1XUwtUKelB/LjyIpbprK6TTcRekJwLPSUby6rXgtWI50 zHaJbB3xCu2ZT/jQu/ADjCvVv9LehXeVVh6Z76WQNkpNcv14LRV6iP6a2OBpzKDa cR6Z9EsSPqQY8/Dg9fSIl13/Fkv8y+Ot9cHU+W5XOIGgMYr8ZikSWp6S/PcbskI0 4FC6wHQpO/mEqVSJkDTTPhCTjrucDu7s5F08D81bi4wN8D6kblxFq6i37kq72tF2 NtVGmy4VfZ2oOvW2LhpF/bKBLeozDBdTh8YddRnuztReGhNcuCEcjqjNDmn3wa1s eK7p+ssGmFzaJfl1QyPWY0KAHjf/gWyUxcZeij2yPOVpFe8EOiOHcnQdibVZ+Rsu 2tmW4zxDgrZeHBP+k/RkMJqLVuIRT5OH8oXUl4whyVrJoMU2Yt6iMIx+udSyWy4y j1lfYT2pint5zjj3xAEdr857ypzlQ8frI/85SufQUDidUMMP885ZeidMGIdwvYia oR0oJxXri3Px1QgA2hxKBbiu4SYAMQOpdX/m9tYgcN5H36KYCI4= =UvTI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VNmVAG70LQrkNslD--