Re: Is it deliberate that sysutils/u-boot-tools is not updated when u-boot-master (and company) progress?
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 18:09:36 UTC
On 2021-Apr-8, at 00:13, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at bidouilliste.com> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:38:58 -0700 > Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> sysutils/u-boot-tools is still back at 2020.07 : >> >> Commit message (Expand) Author Age Files Lines >> * Remove # $FreeBSD$ from Makefiles. Mathieu Arnold 34 hours 1 -1/+0 >> * u-boot: Update to 2020.07 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-07-08 3 -14/+4 >> . . . >> >> But there have been 2020.10 and 2021.04 updates since then: >> >> Commit message (Expand) Author Age Files Lines >> * sysutils/u-boot-*: Update to 2021.04 Emmanuel Vadot 16 hours 2 -5/+6 >> . . . >> * sysutils/u-boot-*: Update to 2020.10 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-11-07 3 -4/+35 >> . . . >> * u-boot: Update to 2020.07 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-07-08 3 -34/+5 >> >> I'll note that u-boot-master has: >> >> BUILD_DEPENDS+= gsed:textproc/gsed \ >> . . . >> mkimage:sysutils/u-boot-tools \ >> . . . >> >> and u-boot-tools has: >> >> DISTVERSION= 2020.07 >> >> This may well be just fine, such as if using somewhat older versions >> of u-boot-tools has historically been more stable despite version >> mismatches. But I figured I'd ask: >> >> Is the use of the older u-boot-tools deliberate? >> >> === >> Mark Millard >> marklmi at yahoo.com >> ( dsl-only.net went >> away in early 2018-Mar) > > Most of the time it's not deliberate as it's just that I forgot this > port. > This time is was deliberate as some new tools fails to compile and I > didn't had time to look deeper for now. sysutils/u-boot-tools looks to still be at 2020.07 . I just figured that I'd check on what the status is for sysutils/u-boot-tools relative to the new 2021.07 of sysutils/u-boot . For all I know 2020.07 may well be the most recent to build and operate well. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)