Re: orch(1) for tty testing
- In reply to: Kyle Evans : "orch(1) for tty testing"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:56:55 UTC
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:55 PM Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a tool for tty testing w/ lua scripts, inspired by expect(1) and > with some similarities, but explicitly without the goal of trying to be > compatible: > > https://git.kevans.dev/kevans/orch > > An example of its use is here: > > https://git.kevans.dev/kevans/tty-tests/src/branch/main/test_canon.orch > > Each spawn() creates a new pts(4) and allows us to drive I/O to the > process with write/match statements. I have one or two tests written > with it so far and the end result is, IMO, much less painful looking and > less error prone than the equivalent in C. > > It still needs a bit of polish (e.g., improved diagnostics when a match > fails), but I'd like to consider importing this somewhere for use in the > near future for tty testing given how much it simplifies. I can push it > to ports, but we have a private liblua in base so it could be built and > banished off into, e.g., /usr/tests/sys/kern/tty/, to make my life just > a tad easier re: getting these to run in CI. It's pretty lightweight; > the orch binary on my amd64 system clocks in at ~27K, and orch.lua at 13K. > > Any objections to importing this new tool into /usr/tests or maybe even > /usr/libexec? > Seems useful enough to include. For more than just testing... Warner