Re: mailwrapper behaviour if mailer.conf can't be opened

From: Lexi Winter <lexi_at_le-fay.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:46:33 UTC
Ed Maste:
> Mark, Warner and I discussed this today and we agree with the
> arguments you made. One thing I think we should still do is describe
> the behaviour in mailwrapper(8), indicating that we fall back to the
> default MTA if mailer.conf does not exist.

that seems reasonable; i see this is already merged, but i'll submit
another PR for the manpage update.  (please prod me about that if i
forget!)