From nobody Tue Sep 05 16:03:59 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rg9VD5Fw6z4sLQG for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 16:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from omta002.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta002.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rg9VD1GB5z4h54 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 16:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cy.schubert@cschubert.com has no SPF policy when checking 3.97.99.33) smtp.mailfrom=cy.schubert@cschubert.com; dmarc=none Received: from shw-obgw-4001a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.142]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id dW1VqJjGm6NwhdYX3qMI8z; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 16:04:01 +0000 Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.66.152.170]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id dYX1q11XsHFsOdYX2qV46f; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 16:04:01 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=XZqaca15 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=64f75171 a=y8EK/9tc/U6QY+pUhnbtgQ==:117 a=y8EK/9tc/U6QY+pUhnbtgQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zNV7Rl7Rt7sA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=EkcXrb_YAAAA:8 a=ibiLZvmRlstru0EzaRkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=LK5xJRSDVpKd5WXXoEvA:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D43B1A9; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by slippy.cwsent.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 51C07C0; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.8+dev Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Warner Losh cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Last bits of SCCS, RCS, CVS and Subversion IDs In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Warner Losh message dated "Fri, 01 Sep 2023 20:19:15 -0600." List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arch List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:03:59 -0700 Message-Id: <20230905160359.51C07C0@slippy.cwsent.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfLHw77uxAxAJ9ibDiWDkNdtq6GtIWI8JMgoXBP5uM8xH73GAnlu6gItZSO0zLJIBiqFBN6HE3ljZFq5L1lZqpQzp1bjwrmx0VcgXKZobd5gU2GDT0kIR SF5U6d+GRXJWSfH6DLEaKuA9BrEgXKzyAgdoYKj+ZINZGtBcFJPEKmD63bUFMwGwCXX0aBrcAfVaOW7BbPHpbMUP223lA0PxJkTubBNoGW1b0fhq5iOEvocF X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.80 / 15.00]; R_BAD_CTE_7BIT(3.50)[7bit]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[3.97.99.33:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cschubert.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; BLOCKLISTDE_FAIL(0.00)[3.97.99.33:server fail,70.66.152.170:server fail]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arch@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:3.96.0.0/15, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Rg9VD1GB5z4h54 In message , Warner Losh writes: > > So I plan on just removing the SCCS, RCS, CVS and Subversion Ids that > remain in the tree. Though I removed 32k $FreeBSD$ lines, there's about 100 > or so remaining, and a few hundred miscellaneous other IDs. I do plan on > keeping the $NetBSD$ and $OpenBSD$ lines for now, though. > > Comments? I think the NetBSD and OpenBSD lines still serve some purpose, for two reasons. 1. The OpenBSD lines still document the baseline from which a source was obtained. Not so much the NetBSD lines since they now use Mercurial. OpenBSD still uses CVS. 2. The remaining OpenBSD lines may reduce merge conflicts if they remain. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: Web: https://nwtime.org e^(i*pi)+1=0 u;Pÿ