From nobody Fri Mar 31 18:57:02 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Pp8fT4Hpmz437Hb for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhorne@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Pp8fT2P9Gz3Ffk for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhorne@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1680289025; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qg7/NiSWO+OuRXGis/E/zOitjtWkGxFlQJfOjETnWYo=; b=xVRnVdDEE7jqNolUdQXbJQw4hG433kLKVB/djKd+nt/kXZf4GpyuoiyKMyQ29oADjLS/DY jHKFE2RLzpxw/fb/7Xm6+UgKznrqp7C6ppwaB8nADkz1qjG4/JAn2SHE8/msAwiRPLgc5Z EjHnVXysYwkFb+xlp6rh+mdPDE9t561ay/lQogtV5ppT62nO4N6ym1Eiw6ypMq/pkloyhs E6Lnh++l7+EZEZAy3Wgq7B/h/lkdnHYfxvi2IrigiqA/9vNfbowKjNfTQosdYIziUPHaLC J6Cl+CEAdt2vPNLiV9sHKJp4z5YtOJAPjPbC5R3Qq+surS1FSc1y0FoGcuWgug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1680289025; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qg7/NiSWO+OuRXGis/E/zOitjtWkGxFlQJfOjETnWYo=; b=rKb/j90sctW3GTfiR9JotAtjAoi6mDcur+6Re3Sgc2yvLKNejGLpkFB4coPyI/2MCgpZvB vF4Cl5B50/sJw2deF4OBuK1ah2mP+E5CnNEESMSQ9PN4IjneSH/ifLzwINPKSTcstxzV7K g3GsbJMQgYQxsITyVddH33DojAo1KJUx7jEXqWPSBmCGCvH0GDr0A7S4gsEeiMbHMLsyAV R46VMe/WeUWevdBAz9UVvOgv8MLttbl/aXMHW138ruBfcWS1RsTDTKG1SWPja+K9E8hLom ZWn/+x3mk+NSPbEXzqlBsYhmrWEzE0fXxzAUzMADA0SBtIYsD5t3+DjPxkU4Bw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1680289025; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yd0yyxJwKtMj1q3jmlu14Yd+EYtIJJ3SXv7LSb0Sg/hrFrIhjkTSzU+pM1Zx3/Cix7h96Y cixe3x5P+o4cHWCal/b5DssVCGCz06OOh+8VBjktDSJl4gFls2+0nbsw4TZavo/2iOnH5o WGPX9no9GiNb8w6GzQ54sPPa55fnxYeGt2QRDB6+GQO6uW07+xTreNhMHdjAzLuAW8HBQU jXfUndkY3/Bq5cdYTIQgOgHDtL82Vdpt5vTwhHSZcL+qtNHN0WYQ9mPu6kDTyM9FZCx4jl 2ixtJGN2BdbWOnfqDVrOURHT3vVMzV6PuaC4VVnzLQTfVC5zbLlP9j07AUExPw== Received: from [192.168.1.151] (host-173-212-76-127.public.eastlink.ca [173.212.76.127]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: mhorne) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Pp8fT0dKQz19jG for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhorne@freebsd.org) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:57:02 -0300 List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arch List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: Deprecate/remove riscv64sf Content-Language: en-CA To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <629bf85d-4d48-17f5-cb26-dfd29f7e6ff7@FreeBSD.org> From: Mitchell Horne In-Reply-To: <629bf85d-4d48-17f5-cb26-dfd29f7e6ff7@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 3/29/23 15:17, John Baldwin wrote: > Is anyone using riscv64sf?  All of the existing RISC-V boards include > hard-float > support as well as QEMU.  The FPGA cores we use at Cambridge also all > support > hard-float.  My understanding is that glibc doesn't bother supporting > soft-float > on RV64.  If no one is using it (and has no plans to use it), then I > propose > we drop it in 14.0 and save one more buildworld from make tinderbox. > Seems great to me. Personally I have not done anything to build, test, or otherwise verify the functionality of the riscv64sf variant in years. Also I do not recall any questions or interest in it from users or devs alike. Cheers, Mitchell