Re: git: 61194e9852e6 - main - Add kqueue1() syscall

From: Alan Somers <asomers_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 23:45:17 UTC 
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 4:39 PM Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> The branch main has been updated by kib:
>
> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=61194e9852e641d1533cd04a5679d6042ff975d3
>
> commit 61194e9852e641d1533cd04a5679d6042ff975d3
> Author:     Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org>
> AuthorDate: 2023-03-25 23:39:02 +0000
> Commit:     Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org>
> CommitDate: 2023-03-27 23:39:26 +0000
>
>     Add kqueue1() syscall
>
>     It takes the flags argument.  Immediate use is to provide the KQUEUE_CLOEXEC
>     flag for kqueue(2).
>
>     Reviewed by:    emaste, jhb
>     Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
>     MFC after:      1 week
>     Differential revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39271

We already have abort2(2), dup2(2), pipe2(2), and thr_kill2(2) that
are similar to other syscalls but with a flags argument.
Additionally, Linux has a renameat(2).  But I'm not aware of any
syscalls named xxx1.  Should we call this new one kqueue2 to follow
the existing convention?

-Alan