Re: git: b12ccd0bb1b3 - main - stand: Remove double words in source code comments
- In reply to: John Baldwin : "Re: git: b12ccd0bb1b3 - main - stand: Remove double words in source code comments"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:13:52 UTC
Hi John, On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:56:49AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On 4/17/23 11:59 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:12:51AM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 06:31:28AM +0100, Jessica Clarke wrote: > >>> On 18 Apr 2023, at 06:15, Gordon Bergling wrote: > >> [...] > >>>> --- a/stand/i386/boot0/Makefile > >>>> +++ b/stand/i386/boot0/Makefile > >>>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ BOOT_BOOT0_FLAGS?= 0x8f > >>>> # 0xb6 (182d) corresponds to 10 seconds. > >>>> BOOT_BOOT0_TICKS?= 0xb6 > >>>> > >>>> -# The base address that we the boot0 code to to run it. Don't change this > >>>> +# The base address that we the boot0 code to run it. Don't change this > >>> > >>> This was correct and is now incorrect; read as "that we [load] the > >>> boot0 code to in order to run it". > >> > >> I just reverted the change. Sorry, not a native speaker on this side > >> and the sentence was a little hard to understand. > > > > This reminds me of the situation with commit 8ca67bf1273 which jrtc27@ > > pointed out was wrong, so I'd say again that comments like this should > > be rephrased: these consequent double words make it hard to understand > > and just begging for someone to try to "fix" it again in the future. > > Yes, I'll try to reword it. Gordon, your second change here was correct > (the double "value") and you should go ahead and re-do that one. Thanks for the reminder, done in 66095010d1f4. --Gordon