Re: git: 2a58b312b62f - main - zfs: merge openzfs/zfs@431083f75

From: Mark Millard <marklmi_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 04:31:17 UTC
On Apr 15, 2023, at 17:27, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Apr 15, 2023, at 15:49, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> . . .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (Mostly written as I progressed but some material later
>>> inserted into/around previously written material.)
>>> 
>>> Summary:
>>> 
>>> As stands, it looks like reverting the dnode_is_dirty
>>> code is what fixes the corruptions that my type of
>>> test context produced via poudriere bulk activity .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The details that lead to that summary . . .
>>> 
>>> Using my my build environment for updating my temporary,
>>> experimental context, an environment running a world and
>>> and kernel that predate the import:
>>> 
>>> # uname -apKU
>>> FreeBSD CA72_4c8G_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #90 main-n261544-cee09bda03c8-dirty: Wed Mar 15 20:25:49 PDT 2023     root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400082 1400082
>>> 
>>> (Note the "nondbg": I normally run non-debug main builds,
>>> but with symbols not stripped.)
>>> 
>>> The kernel and world for this are what is in old-main-CA72:
>>> 
>>> # bectl list
>>> BE            Active Mountpoint Space Created
>>> main-CA72     R      -          3.98G 2023-04-12 20:29
>>> old-main-CA72 N      /          1.08M 2023-02-06 19:44
>>> 
>>> (Most everything else is outside the BE's and so is shared
>>> across the BE's.)
>>> 
>>> I updated to also have (whitespace details likely
>>> not preserved in this note):
>>> 
>>> # git -C /usr/main-src/ diff /usr/main-src/sys/contrib/openzfs/module/zfs/dnode.c
>>> diff --git a/sys/contrib/openzfs/module/zfs/dnode.c b/sys/contrib/openzfs/module/zfs/dnode.c
>>> index 367bfaa80726..49a7f59c0da4 100644
>>> --- a/sys/contrib/openzfs/module/zfs/dnode.c
>>> +++ b/sys/contrib/openzfs/module/zfs/dnode.c
>>> @@ -1772,17 +1772,7 @@ dnode_is_dirty(dnode_t *dn)
>>> {
>>>      mutex_enter(&dn->dn_mtx);
>>>      for (int i = 0; i < TXG_SIZE; i++) {
>>> -               list_t *list = &dn->dn_dirty_records[i];
>>> -               for (dbuf_dirty_record_t *dr = list_head(list);
>>> -                   dr != NULL; dr = list_next(list, dr)) {
>>> -                       if (dr->dr_dbuf == NULL ||
>>> -                           (dr->dr_dbuf->db_blkid != DMU_BONUS_BLKID &&
>>> -                           dr->dr_dbuf->db_blkid != DMU_SPILL_BLKID)) {
>>> -                               mutex_exit(&dn->dn_mtx);
>>> -                               return (B_TRUE);
>>> -                       }
>>> -               }
>>> -               if (dn->dn_free_ranges[i] != NULL) {
>>> +               if (multilist_link_active(&dn->dn_dirty_link[i])) {
>>>                      mutex_exit(&dn->dn_mtx);
>>>                      return (B_TRUE);
>>>              }
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I did my usual buildworld buildkernel sequence and then
>>> one of my normal install sequences into main-CA72 to
>>> update it to have the change, as well as the prior
>>> material involved in my first experiment that I'd
>>> reported on.
>>> 
>>> I cleared the content of the jail that I use for
>>> temporary experiments, such as the prior testing that
>>> got the 11 builder failures:
>>> 
>>> # poudriere pkgclean -jmain-CA72-bulk_a -A
>>> 
>>> I then rebooted using the updated main-CA72 BE.
>>> 
>>> Then I started the:
>>> 
>>> # poudriere bulk -jmain-CA72-bulk_a -w -f ~/origins/CA72-origins.txt
>>> . . .
>>> [00:00:37] Building 476 packages using up to 16 builders
>>> [00:00:37] Hit CTRL+t at any time to see build progress and stats
>>> [00:00:38] [01] [00:00:00] Builder starting
>>> [00:00:40] [01] [00:00:02] Builder started
>>> [00:00:40] [01] [00:00:00] Building ports-mgmt/pkg | pkg-1.19.1_1
>>> 
>>> In the prior experiment it got:
>>> 
>>> 476 = 252 success + 11 failed + 213 skipped
>>> 
>>> and it reported the time for that as: 00:37:52.
>>> 
>>> A normal from-scratch build takes many hours (multiple
>>> compiler toolchains and such) so my first report after
>>> this point will be for one of:
>>> 
>>> A) It got to, say, 00:40:00 or beyond with, or without
>>> failures.
>>> vs.
>>> B) It got failures and stopped before that.
>>> 
>>> . . . TIME GOES BY . . .
>>> 
>>> At about 00:40:00 the status was:
>>> 
>>> [00:40:00] [06] [00:00:00] Building x11/libXv | libXv-1.0.12,1
>>> load: 30.73  cmd: sh 1508 [nanslp] 2400.88r 6.69u 11.90s 0% 3960k
>>> [main-CA72-bulk_a-default] [2023-04-15_14h47m19s] [parallel_build:] Queued: 476 Built: 235 Failed: 0   Skipped: 0   Ignored: 0   Fetched: 0   Tobuild: 241  Time: 00:40:01
>>> ID  TOTAL                    ORIGIN   PKGNAME                           PHASE PHASE    TMPFS       CPU% MEM%
>>> [15] 00:07:44     devel/py-lxml@py39 | py39-lxml-4.9.2                   stage 00:00:08 40.00 KiB     0%   0%
>>> [01] 00:00:34         x11/libXxf86vm | libXxf86vm-1.1.4_3        build-depends 00:00:03 56.00 KiB   2.3%   0%
>>> [16] 00:01:59     x11-toolkits/libXt | libXt-1.2.1,1                 configure 00:00:52 40.00 KiB   0.3%   0%
>>> [02] 00:01:40             devel/dbus | dbus-1.14.6,1                 configure 00:00:05 36.00 KiB   0.5%   0%
>>> [03] 00:02:20         x11/libXrender | libXrender-0.9.10_2           configure 00:01:27 40.00 KiB     0%   0%
>>> [04] 00:00:44      graphics/libglvnd | libglvnd-1.6.0            build-depends 00:00:13 52.00 KiB  20.3% 0.1%
>>> [05] 00:01:39              x11/xprop | xprop-1.2.6                   configure 00:00:45 56.00 KiB   0.7% 0.2%
>>> [06] 00:00:14              x11/libXv | libXv-1.0.12,1              pkg-depends 00:00:03 52.00 KiB   3.6%   0%
>>> [07] 00:01:57          x11/libXfixes | libXfixes-6.0.0               configure 00:00:42 40.00 KiB   0.1%   0%
>>> [08] 00:03:01           devel/glib20 | glib-2.76.1,2                 configure 00:01:26 40.00 KiB   4.3% 0.1%
>>> [09] 00:01:21 shells/bash-completion | bash-completion-2.11_2,2      configure 00:00:13 32.00 KiB   5.7%   0%
>>> [10] 00:06:26   devel/qt5-buildtools | qt5-buildtools-5.15.8p157       package 00:01:57 44.00 KiB  76.1% 0.1%
>>> [11] 00:01:20          print/psutils | psutils-1.17_5                    stage 00:00:03 40.00 KiB   0.2%   0%
>>> [12] 00:02:09         x11/libxkbfile | libxkbfile-1.1.0              configure 00:01:22 44.00 KiB   0.1%   0%
>>> [13] 00:08:54       devel/cmake-core | cmake-core-3.25.1                 build 00:01:43 36.00 KiB 694.9% 5.2%
>>> [14] 00:01:20     x11/xcb-util-image | xcb-util-image-0.4.0_1        configure 00:00:14 48.00 KiB     0%   0%
>>> [00:40:14] Logs: /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/main-CA72-bulk_a-default/2023-04-15_14h47m19s
>>> [00:40:22] [11] [00:01:28] Finished print/psutils | psutils-1.17_5: Success
>>> 
>>> So no failures so far, 235 ports built and a bunch in process.
>>> 
>>> Note: maximum observed ("MaxObs") load averages so far
>>> as shown below (for there being only 16 cores, i.e.,
>>> 16 Cortex-A72 threads, one per core):
>>> 
>>> load averages:  43.75,  34.32,  27.40 MaxObs:  45.03,  34.32,  27.40
>>> 
>>> I'll report again if it gets a corruption failure.
>>> Otherwise it will be many hours before it would
>>> complete without such failures (multiple compiler
>>> toolchain builds and such).
>>> 
>> 
>> To be explicit, since I've now seen your commit: My
>> test does not include the change (whitespace details
>> not preserved in this note)
>> 
>> @@ -2650,9 +2641,7 @@ dnode_next_offset(dnode_t *dn, int flags, uint64_t *offset,
>> rw_enter(&dn->dn_struct_rwlock, RW_READER);
>> 
>> if (dn->dn_phys->dn_nlevels == 0) {
>> - if (!(flags & DNODE_FIND_HOLE)) {
>> - error = SET_ERROR(ESRCH);
>> - }
>> + error = SET_ERROR(ESRCH);
>> goto out;
>> }
>> 
>> 
>> I make no claims about which way dnode_next_offset should be.
>> I was only providing some independent evidence that might
>> prove of some use to folks that understand the alternative
>> code sequences.
>> 
>> 
>> For reference, at about the 1 hr point for what I'm testing:
>> 
>> [00:57:49] [01] [00:00:51] Finished sysutils/u-boot-tools | u-boot-tools-2022.10: Success
>> [main-CA72-bulk_a-default] [2023-04-15_14h47m19s] [parallel_build:] Queued: 476 Built: 306 Failed: 0   Skipped: 0   Ignored: 0   Fetched: 0   Tobuild: 170  Time: 00:59:49
>> ID  TOTAL                   ORIGIN   PKGNAME             PHASE PHASE    TMPFS     CPU% MEM%
>> [06] 00:16:54 devel/binutils@native | binutils-2.40_2,1 package 00:04:22 56.00 KiB 100% 0.2%
>> [09] 00:15:50           lang/ruby31 | ruby-3.1.3_2,1    package 00:00:28 40.00 KiB 100% 0.2%
>> [13] 00:28:43      devel/cmake-core | cmake-core-3.25.1 package 00:14:20 36.00 KiB 100% 0.2%
>> [01:00:03] Logs: /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/main-CA72-bulk_a-default/2023-04-15_14h47m19s
>> [01:00:06] [06] [00:16:57] Finished devel/binutils@native | binutils-2.40_2,1: Success
> 
> Just a status update as of lang/gcc12 finishing up:
> 
> [02:18:39] [03] [01:18:30] Finished lang/gcc12 | gcc12-12.2.0_5: Success
> [02:19:11] [02] [00:12:27] Finished print/harfbuzz-icu | harfbuzz-icu-7.1.0: Success
> load: 63.40  cmd: sh 59209 [runnable] 0.03r 0.00u 0.00s 0% 4012k
> [main-CA72-bulk_a-default] [2023-04-15_14h47m19s] [parallel_build:] Queued: 476 Built: 404 Failed: 0   Skipped: 0   Ignored: 0   Fetched: 0   Tobuild: 72   Time: 02:19:04
> ID  TOTAL                          ORIGIN   PKGNAME                                   PHASE PHASE    TMPFS       CPU% MEM%
> [15] 01:15:01                 devel/llvm16 | llvm16-16.0.0_1                           build 00:55:16 4.00 KiB  428.6% 4.4%
> [03] 01:19:09                   lang/gcc12 | gcc12-12.2.0_5                  build_port_done 00:00:39 4.00 KiB   27.8%   0%
> [04] 00:51:27                    lang/rust | rust-1.68.0                               build 00:41:24 8.00 KiB  480.6% 4.3%
> [06] 00:12:09 print/ghostscript9-agpl-base | ghostscript9-agpl-base-9.56.1_8           build 00:07:19 36.00 KiB   0.7%   0%
> [09] 01:15:01                 devel/llvm15 | llvm15-15.0.7_1                           build 00:57:14 4.00 KiB  436.2%   5%
> [02:19:18] Logs: /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/main-CA72-bulk_a-default/2023-04-15_14h47m19s
> 
> So 404 packages built and 0 failures to build. 5 builders active
> at the time.
> 
> FYI at about the same time:
> load averages:  64.31,  66.32,  66.68 MaxObs:  99.41,  83.15,  74.18 
> 
> I'll note that I use non-default options to avoid LTO based builds
> of compiler toolchains and such and this testing is of my normal
> style of builds, not of FreeBSD default options.
> 
> I'll also note that, unlike my normal builds on this machine, this
> is with USE_TMPFS=data ( instead of USE_TMPFS=all ). This leads to
> a lot more ZFS I/O, which seemed appropriate for the type of
> testing context involved. I've one other machine that I normally
> use USE_TMPFS=all with but the rest normally use USE_TMPFS=data .
> This is because only the 2 machines have the RAM to make the
> USE_TMPFS=all reasonable. The machine in use has 64 GiBytes
> of RAM and "Swap: 241664Mi Total" for the 16 hardware thread
> context, not that it has ever used much of the swap, except when
> some process turned into a massive-size file generator. (64-bit
> offset limited other than my noticing and killing such?)
> 

The bjam command used for stage for devel/boost-libs is a
long running, single process, single threaded context. So
far over 50 CPU minutes worth for stage.

[main-CA72-bulk_a-default] [2023-04-15_14h47m19s] [parallel_build:] Queued: 476 Built: 463 Failed: 0   Skipped: 0   Ignored: 0   Fetched: 0   Tobuild: 13   Time: 06:40:59
 ID  TOTAL              ORIGIN   PKGNAME           PHASE PHASE    TMPFS     CPU% MEM%
[02] 01:06:33 devel/boost-libs | boost-libs-1.81.0 stage 00:55:57 16.00 KiB 100% 0.5%
[06:41:12] Logs: /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/main-CA72-bulk_a-default/2023-04-15_14h47m19s

But, so far: 463 ports built, 0 failures. It may be
a while before the last 12 get a chance, as they
wait for devel/boost-libs to complete.


===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com