Re: git: e72c522858cb - main - divert(4): make it compilable and working without INET
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 16:02:02 UTC
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:54:49AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: B> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: B> B> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 06:39:53AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: B> > B> > B> > Author: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> B> > B> > B> > AuthorDate: 2022-08-30 22:09:21 +0000 B> > B> > B> > Commit: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> B> > B> > B> > CommitDate: 2022-08-30 22:09:21 +0000 B> > B> > B> > B> > B> > B> > divert(4): make it compilable and working without INET B> > B> > B> > B> > B> > B> > Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36383 B> > B> > B> B> > B> > B> Well, almost at least.... B> > B> > B> > B> > I wonder why LINT-NOINET builds without this?? B> > B> B> > B> I wondered the same last night.. I would be good to find out? B> > B> > Ok, I think that assumption that sysctl parts of divert require B> > INET were just wrong, that's why LINT-NOINET builds. B> B> Not entirely. It's because sys/netinet/in_proto.c uncodonitionally B> currently provides _net_inet for the sysctl. B> The reason for that is that a lot of AF independent sysctls were initially B> put under inet but are equally used for inet6 or neither in the network stack. B> B> You will need at least #if defined(INET6) || defined(INET) around the sysctls B> in divert.c then. B> B> A LINT-NOIP kernel will complain about the missing symbol if we keep compiling B> divert without INET or INET6 in the kernel: My goal was not to make divert(4) supported on NOIP kernel. The goal was to make it supported on NOINET, an IPv6 only kernel. I don't see any value for divert(4) on a kernel without either stack. -- Gleb Smirnoff