From nobody Mon May 30 23:18:19 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-src-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B8D1B67020; Mon, 30 May 2022 23:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LBrtk2Sb4z4mpy; Mon, 30 May 2022 23:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from shw-obgw-4001a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.142]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id vkBXnsIGRwtwGvoeNnrtGG; Mon, 30 May 2022 23:18:15 +0000 Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.66.148.124]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id voeSnbqgIE4bivoeTnw7ii; Mon, 30 May 2022 23:18:22 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=YdeuWidf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=629550be a=Cwc3rblV8FOMdVN/wOAqyQ==:117 a=Cwc3rblV8FOMdVN/wOAqyQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=oZkIemNP1mAA:10 a=JAf30KXuAAAA:8 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=EkcXrb_YAAAA:8 a=xgYfDyDZrFt80GqYi8EA:9 a=JOWeiY5itpwPQvuQ8dm/GawRuwE=:19 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=GEL62FyrTCmHtEug2d3R:22 a=pxhY87DP9d2VeQe4joPk:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=LK5xJRSDVpKd5WXXoEvA:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADC73C4; Mon, 30 May 2022 16:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by slippy.cwsent.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26E34CE; Mon, 30 May 2022 16:18:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7+dev Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: David Wolfskill cc: Cy Schubert , Warner Losh , Kirk McKusick , src-committers , "" , dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org, Toomas Soome Subject: Re: git: 076002f24d35 - main - Do comprehensive UFS/FFS superblock integrity checks when reading a superblock. In-reply-to: References: <202205271922.24RJMOJ2039923@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20220530215552.EE5432C@slippy.cwsent.com> <20220530222402.E22C7114@slippy.cwsent.com> <20220530225330.1EB67197@slippy.cwsent.com> Comments: In-reply-to David Wolfskill message dated "Mon, 30 May 2022 16:11:14 -0700." List-Id: Commit messages for the main branch of the src repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 16:18:19 -0700 Message-Id: <20220530231819.26E34CE@slippy.cwsent.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfPE8zGnimT9UNHUQuFuSkfJXAEjV1Q6sQNhPZyR1NkbO3a4m6w4RLssaAY1XA57wou1LHkta0kLgUKFgCat7RQXAMUHlSycMzd/dCszim25WmZ1t/SD2 e6yimsbq3FDECvTpobIq01MrLRRiHQEjszrabJPz6PEdxy2rkl9plWNPl5Z/JkS7NSnvZeH+abPb+k3QYq54F0qr/QBEN8/Ut6tFNBIJ7lkx+YcrM+tl4v1f t/H6db1eV2H23RowfETPIhpX5BozDB6RcdvJjcOGcC2pjFD3oGr5A24lPzaXBLze+eDJ4Q/j3IN/pQRLsrLFiAbXVD9Z8gOp4F1HQSG9YTWU6aYRUNutaGLi zaxojpo4lNvzuVeHIAhr+XnAtQuoeZ8pF5hyq33tFBd87/30c6mKCV4zhT/8AYQ1fxxs5tDA X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4LBrtk2Sb4z4mpy X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N In message , David Wolfskill writes: > > > --fbDsVP+DlYRwzumm > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:53:29PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > > ... > > I don't think this is a filesystem problem. All my / filesystems trace=20 > > their ancestry back to the same machine decades ago. All were cloned at o= > ne=20 > > point using dump | restore. All were newfs'd at some point to update from= > =20 > > 8K blocks to 16K and eventually 32K blocksize, either using my USB rescue= > =20 > > disk or a little bit of geom_mirror musical chairs. All four machines are= > =20 > > consistently set up the same as each other (as much as possible consideri= > ng=20 > > different hardware and mirrors, except for the laptop which has a single= > =20 > > disk). > > I'm not disagreeing with you. :-) > > Providing the FS image (to Toomas) was a diagnostic aid: using it, he > was able to reproduce the issue in his test-scaffolding environment, and > was having some "quality time with gdb" before he needed to do other > things (probably involving sleep). Hmmm. How interesting. Even after having newfs'd the filesystem and restoring it using a kernel and userland that did not have the commit in question I still had the problem. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert or FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org NTP: Web: https://nwtime.org e**(i*pi)+1=0