Re: git: 526f57bf85a2 - main - Update CWARNFLAGS in bsd.sys.mk and CWARNEXTRA in kern.mk for clang 15.
- Reply: John Baldwin : "Re: git: 526f57bf85a2 - main - Update CWARNFLAGS in bsd.sys.mk and CWARNEXTRA in kern.mk for clang 15."
- In reply to: John Baldwin : "Re: git: 526f57bf85a2 - main - Update CWARNFLAGS in bsd.sys.mk and CWARNEXTRA in kern.mk for clang 15."
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 19:15:36 UTC
On 27 Dec 2022, at 18:40, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 12/25/22 3:59 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> The branch main has been updated by dim: >> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=526f57bf85a2b9b113c55ded47b932abc8567bc5 >> commit 526f57bf85a2b9b113c55ded47b932abc8567bc5 >> Author: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> >> AuthorDate: 2022-07-25 10:29:58 +0000 >> Commit: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> >> CommitDate: 2022-12-25 11:58:22 +0000 >> Update CWARNFLAGS in bsd.sys.mk and CWARNEXTRA in kern.mk for clang 15. >> MFC after: 3 days >> --- >> share/mk/bsd.sys.mk | 17 +++++++++++++++-- >> sys/conf/kern.mk | 4 ++++ >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> diff --git a/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk b/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk >> index a220c9d173ed..43359fed29c7 100644 >> --- a/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk >> +++ b/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk >> @@ -86,6 +94,11 @@ CWARNFLAGS.clang+= -Wno-unused-const-variable >> .if ${COMPILER_TYPE} == "clang" && ${COMPILER_VERSION} >= 130000 >> CWARNFLAGS.clang+= -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable >> .endif >> +.if ${COMPILER_TYPE} == "clang" && ${COMPILER_VERSION} >= 150000 >> +CWARNFLAGS.clang+= -Wno-error=array-parameter > > I've fixed all these that GCC 12 finds. Do we really need to disable it for clang > now after I've pushed those recent fixes? I didn't notice, but it's likely because I had the above in the llvm-15-update branch for months now. I found some old build logs from the beginning of December, and they still contained ~20 of these warnings. But if they're all fixed now then sure, lets's remove the -Wno-error= again. >> +CWARNFLAGS.clang+= -Wno-error=deprecated-non-prototype > > I'm curious how many places are broken by this and how much it would be to fix? > This is just adding '(void)' in place of '()', yes? 5859 instances, as of the last count. I committed a bunch of these, and then got some negative feedback about it, so I decided to simply make the warning non-fatal. Somebody else can go over these one by one and fix them as drive-by commits. Indeed the fix is just replacing () in declarations and definitions of C functions with (void). -Dimitry