Re: git: 5e6a2d6eb220 - main - Reapply: move libc++ from /usr/lib to /lib [add /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 -> ../../lib/libc++.so.1 ?]
- Reply: Mark Millard via freebsd-current : "Re: git: 5e6a2d6eb220 - main - Reapply: move libc++ from /usr/lib to /lib [add /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 -> ../../lib/libc++.so.1 ?]"
- In reply to: Mark Millard via freebsd-current : "Re: git: 5e6a2d6eb220 - main - Reapply: move libc++ from /usr/lib to /lib [add /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 -> ../../lib/libc++.so.1 ?]"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 22:04:27 UTC
On 12/30/21 1:09 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2021-Dec-30, at 13:05, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> This asks a question in a different direction that my prior >> reports about my builds vs. Cy's reported build. >> >> Background: >> >> /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so:GROUP ( /lib/libc++.so.1 /usr/lib/libcxxrt.so >> and: >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 23 Dec 29 13:17:01 2021 /usr/lib/libcxxrt.so -> ../../lib/libcxxrt.so.1 >> >> Why did libc++.so.1 not get a: >> >> /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 -> ../../lib/libc++.so.1 > > I forgot to remove the .1 on the left hand side: > > /usr/lib/libc++.so -> ../../lib/libc++.so.1 Because for libc++.so we don't just symlink to the current version of the library (as we do for most other shared libraries) to tell the compiler what to link against for -lc++, instead we use a linker script that tells the compiler to link against both of those libraries when -lc++ is encountered. I have finally reproduced Cy's build error locally and am testing my fix. If it works I'll commit it. -- John Baldwin