Re: git: 5e6a2d6eb220 - main - Reapply: move libc++ from /usr/lib to /lib
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 19:52:53 UTC
> This commit results in a different error. > > ld: error: /export/obj/opt/src/git-src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so:2: > cannot find /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 inside /export/obj/opt/src/git-src/amd64.am > d64/tmp > >>> GROUP ( /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 /usr/lib/libcxxrt.so ) > >>> ^ > c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > invocation) > *** [libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.so.full] Error code 1 > > make[6]: stopped in /opt/src/git-src/lib/libclang_rt/asan_dynamic Working in a system that had the file removed and then manually put back after the upgrade, what I see after this new rebuild (not installed) is: # grep -r 'GROUP.*/lib.*/libc++.so' /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/ /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/lib/libc++/libc++.ld:GROUP ( /lib/libc++.so.1 /usr/lib/libcxxrt.so ) /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/obj-lib32/tmp/usr/lib32/libc++.so:GROUP ( /usr/lib32/libc++.so.1 /usr/lib32/libcxxrt.so ) /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/obj-lib32/lib/libc++/libc++.ld:GROUP ( /usr/lib32/libc++.so.1 /usr/lib32/libcxxrt.so ) grep: /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG/modules/usr/main-src/sys/modules/twa/opt_twa.h: No such file or directory grep: /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/include/dev/ic/esp.h: No such file or directory /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so:GROUP ( /lib/libc++.so.1 /usr/lib/libcxxrt.so That has /lib/libc++.so.1 (outside lib32 materials). But it also has: /tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so and is that a problem? And, checking on when the files were modified: # ls -Tld `grep -rl 'GROUP.*/lib.*/libc++.so' /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/` grep: /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG/modules/usr/main-src/sys/modules/twa/opt_twa.h: No such file or directory grep: /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/include/dev/ic/esp.h: No such file or directory -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 64 Dec 30 08:30:43 2021 /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/lib/libc++/libc++.ld -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 72 Dec 30 08:22:11 2021 /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/obj-lib32/lib/libc++/libc++.ld -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 72 Aug 19 03:09:03 2021 /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/obj-lib32/tmp/usr/lib32/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 64 Dec 30 08:30:43 2021 /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so So lib/libc++/libc++.ld and tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so both had been updated. I used META_MODE. So I do not get a full match to what is reported but the use of the tmp/usr/lib/libc++.so path does seem odd. I've not looked at what a system from before the first move of libc++.so.1 does. I may be able to check that in a while. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com