Re: git: 07d90ee0a621 - main - kvprintf(): Fix '+' conversion handling
- In reply to: Konstantin Belousov : "Re: git: 07d90ee0a621 - main - kvprintf(): Fix '+' conversion handling"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 16:52:43 UTC
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 10:47 PM Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:14:49PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:53 PM Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:35:09PM +0000, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > The branch main has been updated by imp: > > > > > > > > URL: > > > > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=07d90ee0a62110e5161bb0b8a3a0b1b9d2beabad > > > > > > > > commit 07d90ee0a62110e5161bb0b8a3a0b1b9d2beabad > > > > Author: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> > > > > AuthorDate: 2024-06-14 07:30:28 +0000 > > > > Commit: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> > > > > CommitDate: 2024-09-06 18:34:30 +0000 > > > > > > > > kvprintf(): Fix '+' conversion handling > > > > > > > > For example, printf("%+i", 1) prints "+1". However, kvprintf() > did > > > > print just "1" for this example. According to PRINTF(3): > > > > > > > > A sign must always be placed before a number produced by a > signed > > > > conversion. > > > > > > > > For "%+r" radix conversions, keep the "+" handling as it is, > since > > > this > > > > is a non-standard conversion. For "%+p" pointer conversions, > > > continue > > > > to ignore the sign modifier to be in line with libc. > > > > > > > > This change allows to support the ' conversion modifier in the > > > future. > > > > > > > > Reviewed by: imp > > > > Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/1310 > > > > --- > > > > sys/kern/subr_prf.c | 27 +++++++++++++-------------- > > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > Again, isn't rtld_printf needs the same change? > > > > > > > This time I don't think so. I'll double check though. I'd checked when > this > > came in. Thanks for the reminder. > It would be weird if not needed, rtld_printf.c was a copy of subr_prf.c. > Yes. It's required. I've updated and committed. Thanks again for the reminder. I must have been confused when I thought it wasn't needed, since it isn't even a close call looking at it just now. Warner