Re: git: 07d90ee0a621 - main - kvprintf(): Fix '+' conversion handling
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 21:14:49 UTC
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:53 PM Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:35:09PM +0000, Warner Losh wrote: > > The branch main has been updated by imp: > > > > URL: > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=07d90ee0a62110e5161bb0b8a3a0b1b9d2beabad > > > > commit 07d90ee0a62110e5161bb0b8a3a0b1b9d2beabad > > Author: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> > > AuthorDate: 2024-06-14 07:30:28 +0000 > > Commit: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> > > CommitDate: 2024-09-06 18:34:30 +0000 > > > > kvprintf(): Fix '+' conversion handling > > > > For example, printf("%+i", 1) prints "+1". However, kvprintf() did > > print just "1" for this example. According to PRINTF(3): > > > > A sign must always be placed before a number produced by a signed > > conversion. > > > > For "%+r" radix conversions, keep the "+" handling as it is, since > this > > is a non-standard conversion. For "%+p" pointer conversions, > continue > > to ignore the sign modifier to be in line with libc. > > > > This change allows to support the ' conversion modifier in the > future. > > > > Reviewed by: imp > > Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/1310 > > --- > > sys/kern/subr_prf.c | 27 +++++++++++++-------------- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > Again, isn't rtld_printf needs the same change? > This time I don't think so. I'll double check though. I'd checked when this came in. Thanks for the reminder.