git: 654292c0d683 - stable/14 - libthr: add some tests for pthread_atfork() handling
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 04:55:24 UTC
The branch stable/14 has been updated by kevans: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=654292c0d683fb7805df7f876693e125250024bb commit 654292c0d683fb7805df7f876693e125250024bb Author: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2024-11-14 01:33:36 +0000 Commit: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2024-11-22 04:54:52 +0000 libthr: add some tests for pthread_atfork() handling Test that it generally functions, and also that registering multiple times calls each handler in the order that it's documented to call them in. Reviewed by: kib, markj (cherry picked from commit 7e6ac503ffeb81733272d54af367db58e45e57ca) --- lib/libthr/tests/Makefile | 1 + lib/libthr/tests/atfork_test.c | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 228 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/libthr/tests/Makefile b/lib/libthr/tests/Makefile index d882ccfd877c..34e48c63d197 100644 --- a/lib/libthr/tests/Makefile +++ b/lib/libthr/tests/Makefile @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ NETBSD_ATF_TESTS_SH+= cancel_test NETBSD_ATF_TESTS_SH+= exit_test NETBSD_ATF_TESTS_SH+= resolv_test +ATF_TESTS_C+= atfork_test ATF_TESTS_C+= umtx_op_test ATF_TESTS_C+= pthread_sigqueue_test diff --git a/lib/libthr/tests/atfork_test.c b/lib/libthr/tests/atfork_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5133330b1247 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/libthr/tests/atfork_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +/*- + * + * Copyright (C) 2024 Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> + * + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause + * + */ + +#include <sys/wait.h> +#include <errno.h> +#include <pthread.h> +#include <signal.h> +#include <stdbool.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <unistd.h> + +#include <atf-c.h> + +#define EXIT_NOPREPARE 1 +#define EXIT_CALLEDPARENT 2 +#define EXIT_NOCHILD 3 +#define EXIT_BADORDER 4 + +static int child; +static int forked; +static int parent; + +static void +basic_prepare(void) +{ + ATF_REQUIRE(parent == 0); + forked++; +} + +static void +basic_parent(void) +{ + ATF_REQUIRE(forked != 0); + parent++; +} + +static void +basic_child(void) +{ + if (!forked) + _exit(EXIT_NOPREPARE); + if (parent != 0) + _exit(EXIT_CALLEDPARENT); + child++; +} + +/* + * In the basic test, we'll register just once and set some globals to confirm + * that the prepare/parent callbacks were executed as expected. The child will + * use its exit status to communicate to us if the callback was not executed + * properly since we cannot assert there. This is a subset of the + * multi-callback test, but separated out so that it's more obvious from running + * the atfork_test if pthread_atfork() is completely broken or just + * out-of-order. + */ +ATF_TC(basic_atfork); +ATF_TC_HEAD(basic_atfork, tc) +{ + atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr", + "Checks invocation of all three atfork callbacks"); +} +ATF_TC_BODY(basic_atfork, tc) +{ + pid_t p, wpid; + int status; + + pthread_atfork(basic_prepare, basic_parent, basic_child); + + p = fork(); + + ATF_REQUIRE(p >= 0); + if (p == 0) + _exit(child != 0 ? 0 : EXIT_NOCHILD); + + /* + * The child can't use any of our standard atf-c(3) macros, so we have + * to rely on the exit status to convey any shenanigans. + */ + while ((wpid = waitpid(p, &status, 0)) != p) { + ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO(EINTR, wpid == -1); + if (wpid == -1) + continue; + } + + ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(WIFEXITED(status), + "child did not exit cleanly, status %x", status); + + status = WEXITSTATUS(status); + ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(status == 0, "atfork in child %s", + status == EXIT_NOPREPARE ? "did not see `prepare` execute" : + (status == EXIT_CALLEDPARENT ? "observed `parent` executing" : + (status == EXIT_NOCHILD ? "did not see `child` execute" : + "mystery"))); + + ATF_REQUIRE(forked != 0); + ATF_REQUIRE(parent != 0); + ATF_REQUIRE(child == 0); +} + +static void +multi_assert(bool cond, bool can_assert) +{ + if (can_assert) + ATF_REQUIRE((cond)); + else if (!(cond)) + _exit(EXIT_BADORDER); +} + +static void +multi_bump(int *var, int bit, bool can_assert) +{ + int mask, val; + + mask = (1 << (bit - 1)); + val = *var; + + /* + * Every bit below this one must be set, and none of the upper bits + * should be set. + */ + multi_assert((val & mask) == 0, can_assert); + if (bit == 1) + multi_assert(val == 0, can_assert); + else + multi_assert((val & ~mask) == (mask - 1), can_assert); + + *var |= mask; +} + +static void +multi_prepare1(void) +{ + /* + * The bits are flipped for prepare because it's supposed to be called + * in the reverse order of registration. + */ + multi_bump(&forked, 2, true); +} +static void +multi_prepare2(void) +{ + multi_bump(&forked, 1, true); +} + +static void +multi_parent1(void) +{ + multi_bump(&parent, 1, true); +} +static void +multi_parent2(void) +{ + multi_bump(&parent, 2, true); +} + +static void +multi_child1(void) +{ + multi_bump(&child, 1, false); +} +static void +multi_child2(void) +{ + multi_bump(&child, 2, false); +} + +/* + * The multi-atfork test works much like the basic one, but it registers + * multiple times and enforces an order. The child still does just as strict + * of tests as the parent and continues to communicate the results of those + * tests back via its exit status. + */ +ATF_TC(multi_atfork); +ATF_TC_HEAD(multi_atfork, tc) +{ + atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr", + "Checks that multiple callbacks are called in the documented order"); +} +ATF_TC_BODY(multi_atfork, tc) +{ + pid_t p, wpid; + int status; + + pthread_atfork(multi_prepare1, multi_parent1, multi_child1); + pthread_atfork(multi_prepare2, multi_parent2, multi_child2); + + p = fork(); + + ATF_REQUIRE(p >= 0); + if (p == 0) + _exit(child != 0 ? 0 : EXIT_NOCHILD); + + /* + * The child can't use any of our standard atf-c(3) macros, so we have + * to rely on the exit status to convey any shenanigans. + */ + while ((wpid = waitpid(p, &status, 0)) != p) { + ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO(EINTR, wpid == -1); + if (wpid == -1) + continue; + } + + ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(WIFEXITED(status), + "child did not exit cleanly, status %x", status); + + status = WEXITSTATUS(status); + ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(status == 0, "atfork in child %s", + status == EXIT_BADORDER ? "called in wrong order" : + (status == EXIT_NOCHILD ? "did not see `child` execute" : + "mystery")); + + ATF_REQUIRE(forked != 0); + ATF_REQUIRE(parent != 0); + ATF_REQUIRE(child == 0); +} + +ATF_TP_ADD_TCS(tp) +{ + ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp, basic_atfork); + ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp, multi_atfork); + return (atf_no_error()); +}