From nobody Mon Jun 24 16:35:23 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-src-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W7D962LFjz5PD4n; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rlibby@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W7D953xpbz4Plt; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rlibby@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ec61eeed8eso13168281fa.0; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:35:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719246935; x=1719851735; darn=freebsd.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ml2rAe07X/yASHx6Y8A4NnUroo81B9vXHCMbxZrK+Dk=; b=Egh3aT4FgNmfEZUEPig7xbWv6VQuAjr8UxqsWk/oPIwRNy3+LYfAGLIgKh+TenJz7L nr2v3Kc7rS+iIYED6Af97xgtkp/yNO/7om3lBINLH1mx8+De/w3FBviM1UskK4NdbIGE /MQydsDH0StuXgXVqN2G4CjAtoiAHFIqybCTqsO2uOWfa8lZnp5/sgmOltxSUdmetEHK W/sahHVYwaZWSP75t7q5v8JdPR0zDPZ+ChFVWTa1rwTdt8V/eN76XUzhCRTRL2u6+2hI e8C8mCT8rnEQWswjxgClTloo0KZ4z7loPiqIhKYp7Yqebh2cPPw8hAf4l7N61SXgdfT0 AhTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719246935; x=1719851735; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ml2rAe07X/yASHx6Y8A4NnUroo81B9vXHCMbxZrK+Dk=; b=BdHamPbtIj1fSNTOB1WeIvEijq8H6NBrBhK96rQe1tdIQu/jB+ihDzR+JsSEe61Lqe Zi8hKeWs9oSiMbT+FxYHkWRvR46qbnYPHMRu1033e4TeJByhHpRvfHrTU0Th3t5cwLO8 1bcs/+HulBzT699OtQOJbJdaocWfot3C4rn+aetng98FAFc/rMJhuxv8WLcm4qzFUMKP 2LrAU3/KF/GCn1KJXIHOuvBKenhoJ43B94WMD6GMB5ff6Wq0h7cxTswW9EIN3yiF/PKU S5R29y+TXs0ovkXHNN2W9gIP1MSqEYqpStN/KAdeyzkKwST478z7WlRq6VYTIWZN8Hg1 Yg3A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVHlBebKDmae1k4tY67/GnbuGKuFXF6tUM95MZ5Z9ZR/i0z7i3MqYlnBoHxHhurn8WBJRNrOvfYFL1U/3DAbBrw2t6v9B4Fsp8ruNwOEt85koY7ShJOFAdsNE1IFcNVepZmZV7DMH/dYdT2W1X2Lqf4ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy3KDr/jCsuEJcxoRttZ9iwQY+/PERPXKyE5Gt9UQH6cezcyD4Y QeCGhsE3DK+94IIhRUz8ZuhEypPccm2rcpv3gGmxx0hfk0buAN3gI2GVvikQlsi+shtIBYeVUp8 vk1bfxe4zqcwGaz5J2cSxcTvn5TDZv5ao X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGwqtBo9ipE0BWzex60pNSJExZLUAinzYushWXDpoTd02td7Q8NABEz8TjANJR00hh1lT6H4w/J9Gy2I+MGQrs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:ba1:b0:52c:88d7:ae31 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52ce185f67emr3428846e87.48.1719246935212; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:35:35 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the src repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202406192058.45JKwB77036327@gitrepo.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ryan Libby Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:35:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: ddf0ed09bd8f - main - sdt: Implement SDT probes using hot-patching To: Mark Johnston Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4W7D953xpbz4Plt On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:06=E2=80=AFAM Mark Johnston w= rote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 08:36:55AM -0700, Ryan Libby wrote: > > By the way, it seems gcc13 (latest in ports) doesn't support the "Ws" > > constraint. It seems to have been added to gcc 14. I know i386 is tie= r > > 2 these days, and gcc is a second consideration anyway. Trying to test > > out a patch for i386 gcc, I found that it doesn't build currently and > > this is one of a few reasons. > > What happens if "i" is used with gcc? IIRC I had tried gcc+i386 when > testing the patch but the kernel failed to build for other reasons at > the time. Sorry, just realized, I didn't mean to imply this was blocking me. I was able to get far enough through the build to verify my patch and I pushed it already: 88478cc02a20 i386 kernel __storeload_barrier: quiet gcc -Warray-bounds