Re: git: 5faf90050e6c - main - committers-ports.dot: Bring file up to date.
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 06:49:41 UTC
Quoting Fernando Apesteguía <fernape@freebsd.org> (from Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:22:37 GMT): > The branch main has been updated by fernape: > > URL: > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=5faf90050e6c280c314bca58ee61707d8bfdbaf3 > > commit 5faf90050e6c280c314bca58ee61707d8bfdbaf3 > Author: Fernando Apesteguía <fernape@FreeBSD.org> > AuthorDate: 2023-03-30 10:03:00 +0000 > Commit: Fernando Apesteguía <fernape@FreeBSD.org> > CommitDate: 2023-03-30 12:17:10 +0000 > > committers-ports.dot: Bring file up to date. > > Many listed committers are actually alumni. > > Related to this change: 52f576459855 > > Approved by: bcr@ > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39340 I think I noticed some people to be put into the alumi section, which are still active src committers (e.g. gnn). Given the recent discussion about some relaxed handling of the commit bits (sort of: all or nothing, but seek review when in an unfamiliar area): do we really want to put someone into the X-alumni section, if this person is still active in the Y-area? From a bean-counting perspective, I understand that ports!=src, but people looking at ports-alumni may understand that a particular person may have left the project, instead of not doing something anymore in a particular subset of the project. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild@FreeBSD.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF