Re: git: 7ecd99fa424d - main - Build compiler-rt against libunwind, not libcxxrt
- In reply to: Dimitry Andric : "Re: git: 7ecd99fa424d - main - Build compiler-rt against libunwind, not libcxxrt"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:17:54 UTC
On 3/9/22 2:50 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 9 Mar 2022, at 22:45, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >> On 3/9/22 1:30 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> The branch main has been updated by dim: >>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=7ecd99fa424df001028c5cddc52d25b29232f1af >>> commit 7ecd99fa424df001028c5cddc52d25b29232f1af >>> Author: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> >>> AuthorDate: 2022-03-09 21:23:35 +0000 >>> Commit: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> >>> CommitDate: 2022-03-09 21:23:35 +0000 >>> Build compiler-rt against libunwind, not libcxxrt >>> Parts of compiler-rt are also built for libgcc_eh and libgcc_s, and >>> these were already pointing to the libunwind unwind.h. For the sake of >>> consistency, also build compiler-rt itself against the libunwind >>> unwind.h, not the libcxxrt one. >> >> Do we even need the explicit -I at all now that we install unwind.h into /usr/include? > > That depends on the build order; if libcompiler_rt is built before libunwind's headers are installed into ${WORLDTMP}, it might look at the wrong file? I think that can't happen now that we install the header as buildincludes and installincludes should run first before we build any of the libraries? > I guess this is just a 'better safe than sorry' approach. That said, for libcxxrt we used to have the unwind headers only in the C++ include path, so maybe this was a way to get that to work? Yes, I think the problem before is that the installed unwind.h was only in the C++ include path and not in the C include path. I think moving unwind.h to /usr/include is what permits removing the explicit -I. -- John Baldwin