Re: git: d6c0538dae8d - main - ddb: Remove SOFTWARE_SSTEP support
- Reply: Olivier Houchard : "Re: git: d6c0538dae8d - main - ddb: Remove SOFTWARE_SSTEP support"
- Reply: John Baldwin : "Re: git: d6c0538dae8d - main - ddb: Remove SOFTWARE_SSTEP support"
- In reply to: John Baldwin : "Re: git: d6c0538dae8d - main - ddb: Remove SOFTWARE_SSTEP support"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:14:54 UTC
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:48 PM John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 1/7/22 8:27 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > The branch main has been updated by imp: > > > > URL: > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=d6c0538dae8d138219dfd051994a44c50e741212 > > > > commit d6c0538dae8d138219dfd051994a44c50e741212 > > Author: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> > > AuthorDate: 2022-01-07 16:25:33 +0000 > > Commit: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> > > CommitDate: 2022-01-07 16:25:33 +0000 > > > > ddb: Remove SOFTWARE_SSTEP support > > > > It was needed for mips only, and only kinda sorta worked for mips. > It > > can be brought back if we grow another architecture that need it. > > > > Sponsored by: Netflix > > RISC-V would need it in theory (no hardware single step), but no one has > felt the > need to implement the backend support for it. I think 32-bit arm doesn't > support > hardware single step either (but again, no one has bothered to add the > backend > support). > Generally, I agree with these thoughts. I went ahead with the removal because I knew it would be easy to bring back, even years from now should someone[tm] have an implementation for those platforms (though I thought 32-bit arm did have single step in hardware). Should I put it back? Or should we wait until someone shows up with support for a supported platform? Warner