Re: git: 9b967bd65de6 - main - domains: allow domains to be unloaded
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:20:24 UTC
> On 14 Aug 2022, at 15:51, Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 2:22 AM Alexander V. Chernikov > <melifaro@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> The branch main has been updated by melifaro: >> >> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9b967bd65de6647aed68a141dc34f9b223a2593c >> >> commit 9b967bd65de6647aed68a141dc34f9b223a2593c >> Author: Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> >> AuthorDate: 2022-08-12 13:36:53 +0000 >> Commit: Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> >> CommitDate: 2022-08-14 09:22:33 +0000 >> >> domains: allow domains to be unloaded >> >> Add domain_remove() SYSUNINT callback that removes the domain >> from the domain list if it has DOMF_UNLOADABLE flag set. >> This change is required to support netlink ( D36002 ). >> >> Reviewed by: glebius >> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36173 >> --- >> sys/kern/uipc_domain.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> sys/sys/domain.h | 4 ++++ >> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c b/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c >> index c70b3150cbf0..2cae08be089a 100644 >> --- a/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c >> +++ b/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c >> @@ -239,6 +239,29 @@ domain_add(void *data) >> mtx_unlock(&dom_mtx); >> } >> >> +void >> +domain_remove(void *data) >> +{ >> + struct domain *dp = (struct domain *)data; >> + >> + if ((dp->dom_flags & DOMF_UNLOADABLE) == 0) >> + return; >> + >> + mtx_lock(&dom_mtx); >> + if (domains == dp) { >> + domains = dp->dom_next; >> + } else { >> + struct domain *curr; >> + for (curr = domains; curr != NULL; curr = curr->dom_next) { >> + if (curr->dom_next == dp) { >> + curr->dom_next = dp->dom_next; >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + } >> + mtx_unlock(&dom_mtx); >> +} >> + >> /* ARGSUSED*/ >> static void >> domaininit(void *dummy) > > While it's not important for the one domain you care about, this > should likely also check if any contained protocols have > pr_fasttimo/pr_slowtimo and purge them from the appropriate list, just > to be technically correct. (Or at least assert under INVARIANTS that > they do not) That’s a good point! I should have provided more context in the commit message. There is some ongoing work glebius@ is doing in the domain space. Specifically, there are plans to remove this callbacks in the near future - https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36163 stack provides more reasoning and implementation details. Additionally, the KPI may be a bit fluid and may change in the near/mid-term future - that’s why the minimal working version was committed.