Re: git: 0a0f7486413c - main - man: Build manpages for all architectures
- Reply: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re: git: 0a0f7486413c - main - man: Build manpages for all architectures"
- Reply: Kyle Evans : "Re: git: 0a0f7486413c - main - man: Build manpages for all architectures"
- In reply to: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re: git: 0a0f7486413c - main - man: Build manpages for all architectures"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:30:35 UTC
On 25/11/2021 16:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:57:41PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Looking at the output I got another thought: do we need architecture sub-dir >> links at all now that we install manpages to a main directory? >> Is there any benefit to having the same manpage in a directory (like man4) >> and its immediate subdirectory (like man4/arm) ? >> > Hardlink not in the same directory is imho a fragile setup anyway, what if a > user has different mount points here, the hardlink would be broken. while there > is little chances someone is doing that, history told me people are doing weird > things and if they haven't yet, they will soon. > > I continue to think this kind of links should be 1/ symlinks, 2/ relative > symlinks if they are in a situation which can become a cross device issue. Yeah... but are they needed at all? :-) I mean, whichever way we install manpages they are always installed into manX. I do not see a point / benefit of having another copy / link / whatever in manX/arch. P.S. Adding support for "MSYMLINKS" is not that hard. But I'd rather remove some stuff than add some new stuff. -- Andriy Gapon