From nobody Fri Nov 15 10:04:38 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XqXgb1R95z5cwbt; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XqXgb0hZPz4N51; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1731665083; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DYIZS04MrrHwO+WtkwlJjG789z3k58yYUqZCU8SPYm4=; b=nYWWI9ZY2IEoEMZyg2IivraVbrU0QLMFPtTyq+zGByk67WcTmreeMQWOf+kPfr+3yih2gM uWsluX69KUVO3R+8TARW0fg9E3TjSc7gYVlzty72TSj9fZ2J6Z6CeaQipF12SNq6Oa10VS Ku8SpnpfEzY483YlAh5DA6K/jM9oZFWek4MitRTkh/njUESfYVcZnQDGAkI1bszn/qRl8D KhEJsvXda5LIrbPCkk7DXj9ZXhFoEqz3ugBCxrVM6hrO4qfWRqjdkPjn0voudMOubidXbA 3KkW/4DI4RsDCI6fd1aWWgFr6NFutupJTye9XM0VmQ1rTbYqVxvJ+nACxLiUog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1731665083; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DYIZS04MrrHwO+WtkwlJjG789z3k58yYUqZCU8SPYm4=; b=HmNiIqMUx+pXCKx2hGMLTSihgb4ZkhI3LgKUaT6dapI96s5TQpbF7JOEyY/6JFR5lHzMBA wspaW3yo0cKuGnvqOFyAKPwMvvIpXjRtxpTDvrgiGOHU80Md2JakwEv/wYIWv6ks5iShcT wdAXuT6yt4Cu1TVssTEyOnzMm5ZmSpSppU1OPvbxGFR0Q2bMPml+8TuvFZPVW4eG+PaNWE sWBiJn2NppIKN9qKpKpyVBP18Xh8LHuTOJPO16eFXKuCN0dXBeUB29E4MCV3KByL6RvR9x mAb3OmjRGrimcU6/J5W2UE6qkoGNCwalF8hucvyuT4VW0dW0KZf7A1o1CXMKPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1731665083; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qcUjOlsGM8mUOlNtL6DS7vQ6nyKixUprkjzdmv15/fPAydUqz9VocgOcq3lSQatQuKRRcS tsy6bcCVuAWcHSuxQUiJ9ZoSkUHyuDUxTIX2WFzLd4wEE/FCAc8QhaHRmH8qzqpdPUpRGQ kUldUhIDNG3PD75kwXHxC1K0zcvjKXrfV4Q9kxQGZnpcYqYCG3z7G9zI6XqsA+JCCyiX2c 5tmMTiagacVzvbHfDgOlv4pG2wSQNSjmHk1ShPby15ss0IUVvo3tXAu7bOfk2qFeDeYyL2 Nu1TSs1HN6Azl1aL7AAk+ApsjiXKOyJfh9iNzvL68ZTFyfXnRmGBtJSTb1P5hg== Received: from fauth-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fauth-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.201]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: philip/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XqXgZ6grMz1NPn; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@freebsd.org) Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfauth.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DD11200043; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 05:04:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 15 Nov 2024 05:04:41 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrvdeggddtlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnth hsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffoffkjghfgggtsehttdhmtdertddtnecu hfhrohhmpefrhhhilhhiphcurfgrvghpshcuoehphhhilhhiphesfhhrvggvsghsugdroh hrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgffgfeeigeettdeltdfgvedtffdtgedvheeuieet heetfeeifeevveetvddvkeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhhihhlihhpodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhi thihqdduudeiiedviedvgeekqddvfeehudektddtkedqphhhihhlihhppeepfhhrvggvsg hsugdrohhrghesthhrohhusghlvgdrihhspdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeehpdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegurghnsehlrghnghhilhhlvgdrohhrghdprhgtph htthhopehpohhrthhsqdgtohhmmhhithhtvghrshesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghdprhgt phhtthhopeguvghvqdgtohhmmhhithhsqdhpohhrthhsqdgrlhhlsehfrhgvvggsshgurd horhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvvhdqtghomhhmihhtshdqphhorhhtshdqmhgrihhnsehf rhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepshgvtghtvggrmhesfhhrvggvsghsugdroh hrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ia691475d:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 05:04:40 -0500 (EST) From: Philip Paeps To: Dan Langille Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Security Team Subject: Re: git: 0e79ec27f04a - main - security/vuxml: add FreeBSD SAs issued on 2024-10-29 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:04:38 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r6065) Message-ID: <2161D3CF-3A52-46CC-ACD3-D94ADEC11AAC@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: References: <202411130421.4AD4LUrj054403@gitrepo.freebsd.org> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed On 2024-11-13 21:36:49 (+0100), Dan Langille wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 11:21 PM, Philip Paeps wrote: >> + >> + FreeBSD -- Certificate revocation list fetch(1) option >> fails >> + >> + >> + FreeBSD >> + 14.114.1_6 > > I want to find a way that this does not raise false positives. Philip, > we have discussed this before and I'm not saying you are the one to > fix this. I've put this on the agenda for our next secteam call (Monday). We've discussed this before, but we never converged on a solution. From my notes: because we always had a kernel version bump in the pipeline shortly after. Clearly we shouldn't hope for that to happen every time, and we need a structural solution for this. We'll talk about it again on Monday and see if we can come up with something better. Meanwhile: should we revert this vuxml entry until we either find a solution, or bump the kernel version (whichever comes first)? I'd estimate that this particular bug is triggering rather more false positives than actually vulnerable installations. Philip