From nobody Fri Jun 07 07:40:40 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VwY666STFz5N0vS; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 07:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VwY640spCz3x92; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 07:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f92edc7e; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 07:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c456d884 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 7 Jun 2024 07:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:40:40 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Kevin Bowling Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , Daniel Engberg , Lewis Cook , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 4a384fbfb20b - main - accessibility/redshift: Deprecate and set expiration date to 2024-06-30 Message-ID: <20240607094040.167b2517.grembo@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: References: <202406061907.456J7rr8077152@gitrepo.freebsd.org> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VwY640spCz3x92 On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 21:47:17 -0700 Kevin Bowling wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 9:01=E2=80=AFPM Alexey Dokuchaev > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 07:07:53PM +0000, Daniel Engberg wrote: =20 > > > commit 4a384fbfb20b4d684f86aa3af1f898abf809ed49 > > > > > > accessibility/redshift: Deprecate and set expiration date to > > > 2024-06-30 > > > > > > No upstream activity for the past 4 years, a lot of bug reports > > > upstream =20 > > > > Could you please stop arbitrarily deprecating working software? > > Lots of us use redshift as their daily driver because of its > > flexibility and don't really care what happens upstream or whether > > it supports something as useless as Wayland. =20 >=20 > I do not use this software but that is beside the point and I agree in > principle that there seems to be an overeagerness in deprecating ports > recently. If the software is building, and is not retarding progress > elsewhere, there should be no impetus to go hunting for ports even if > they seem less useful than alternatives. If there is some other > technical concern driving this like disk space or build time please > communicate that to ports-developers so it can be debated against > other options. >=20 > > > Redirect users to accessibility/sct =20 > > > > Simplistic program which doesn't even parse command line to give one > > usage information, and "last commit 5 years ago" doesn't bother you > > in this case for some reason. Surely there won't be lots of bug > > reports because there ain't much no features. > > > > Lewis, could you chime in and restore the previous status quo? > > > > ./danfe =20 Just as a datapoint, I'm also using redshift and it works just fine for me. Cheers --=20 Michael Gmelin