Re: git: 94eda313a9d5 - main - mail/dovecot: add LDAP as a default option
- Reply: Cy Schubert : "Re: git: 94eda313a9d5 - main - mail/dovecot: add LDAP as a default option"
- Reply: Alexander Leidinger : "Re: git: 94eda313a9d5 - main - mail/dovecot: add LDAP as a default option"
- In reply to: Cy Schubert : "Re: git: 94eda313a9d5 - main - mail/dovecot: add LDAP as a default option"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 05:44:37 UTC
On 01/30/2024 11:05 pm, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <202401310117.40V1HFmD014823@gitrepo.freebsd.org>, Larry > Rosenman wr > ites: >> The branch main has been updated by ler: >> >> URL: >> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=94eda313a9d5acc5ff8d00fec7a518 >> 62f3e346da >> >> commit 94eda313a9d5acc5ff8d00fec7a51862f3e346da >> Author: Larry Rosenman <ler@FreeBSD.org> >> AuthorDate: 2024-01-31 01:15:05 +0000 >> Commit: Larry Rosenman <ler@FreeBSD.org> >> CommitDate: 2024-01-31 01:17:13 +0000 >> >> mail/dovecot: add LDAP as a default option >> >> PR: 276741 >> Requested by: seichan-ml@wakhok.ne.jp > > What's the compelling reason for this? The PR doesn't say why this > would > benefit everyone and doesn't explain if any negative impacts were > non-existent or mitigated any way. IMO someone asking for a feature or > option without an analysis of impact can possibly result in a POLA > situation. > > Why and will this cause any POLA? POLA shouldn't be a problem except for the ldap-client lib. As to why, I didn't want to go through the argument with the user. I can revert it if you want. I really want a way to split our packages like the dovecot folks do for Linux, but I don't have that understood yet. As I said, if the project wants me to revert it, I can. -- Larry Rosenman http://people.freebsd.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@FreeBSD.org US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Dr, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106