Re: git: 36c21f98ff44 - main - benchmarks/ttcp: Update to 1.13
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:48:02 UTC
On 2024-02-25 04:37, Gleb Popov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:34 PM Daniel Engberg > <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> URL(s) for how we fetch releases/archives from Codeberg > > Ah, sorry, I just wasn't aware we're standardizing on this. Out of > curiosity, what's the rationale behind the > "${ACCOUNTNAME}/${PROJECTNAME}/archive/${DISTVERSIONFULL}${EXTRACT_SUFX}?dummy=/" As I indicated in the pr(1) (276759) when you brought this up. The above does not work: # make -DBATCH fetch => ttcp-1.13.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch https://codeberg.org///archive/1.13.tar.gz?dummy=/ttcp-1.13.tar.gz fetch: https://codeberg.org///archive/1.13.tar.gz?dummy=/ttcp-1.13.tar.gz: Not Found Using *any* form of DIST(VERSION)PREFIX/SUFFIX/NAME is no closer to returning anything but gibberish. This isn't GIT(HUB|LAB) so there aren't any tags within bsd.sites.mk for codeberg to accommodate this form of URL. FTR, to accommodate FreeBSD. I tag versions as ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}. So all of this seems convoluted. If I'm misunderstanding any of this. I'd be more than pleased to know. :) > form? Why the current form is bad?