Re: Re: git: 58dba5b8212f - main - devel/llvm19: prune build on 32-bit archs

From: Mark Millard <marklmi_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 01:15:41 UTC
Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon_at_dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote on
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 23:29:35 UTC :

> Shouldn't BE_WASM kept as default?
> 
> www/firefox depends on devel/wasi-*17, and IIRC, devel/wasi-*17 depends
> on devel/llvm17 with BE_WASM enabled.
> 
> And www/firefox doesn't have ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and NOT_FOR_ARCHS defined.

When I look up the active 140releng-armv7-default build, www/firefox
and www/firefox-esr were skipped because of rust-1.79.0_1 not being
available.

lang/rust (in turn) had failed to build:

=======================<phase: build >============================
===== env: NO_DEPENDS=yes USER=root UID=0 GID=0
===> Building for rust-1.79.0_1
Building bootstrap
running: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/bootstrap/bin/cargo build --manifest-path /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.79.0-src/src/bootstrap/Cargo.toml --verbose --verbose --frozen
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.79.0-src/x.py", line 50, in <module>
bootstrap.main()
File "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.79.0-src/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 1165, in main
bootstrap(args)
File "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.79.0-src/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 1132, in bootstrap
build.build_bootstrap()
File "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.79.0-src/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 888, in build_bootstrap
run(args, env=env, verbose=self.verbose, cwd=self.rust_root)
File "/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.79.0-src/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 187, in run
raise RuntimeError(err)
RuntimeError: failed to run: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/bootstrap/bin/cargo build --manifest-path /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.79.0-src/src/bootstrap/Cargo.toml --verbose --verbose --frozen
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/rust
=>> Cleaning up wrkdir
===> Cleaning for rust-1.79.0_1
build of lang/rust | rust-1.79.0_1 ended at Sun Aug 25 13:39:13 UTC 2024
build time: 00:03:22
!!! build failure encountered !!!


portsfallout.com <http://portsfallout.com/> reports for lang/rust:

port maintainer build environment category date urls
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-08-25 13:36 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-07-25 14:15 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-07-08 00:15 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-06-24 03:53 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-06-13 22:03 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-06-01 02:15 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-05-19 03:51 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-05-06 04:28 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-04-23 02:10 log report port detail FreshPorts
lang/rust rust@FreeBSD.org 140releng-armv7-default build 2024-04-08 09:22 log report port detail FreshPorts

It looks like everything dependent on lang/rust is effectively
broken for armv7 and has been for 5 months (or more), at least
for the FreeBSD package builders and their procedures. (The
reasons may vary over time. I've not looked at the detail.)

133releng-armv7-default and 132releng-armv7-default look
to have a similar status to 140releng-armv7-default as far
as lang/rust failing so everything depending on lang/rust
being broken.

133releng-armv7-quarterly and 132releng-armv7-quarterly
and 140releng-armv7-quarterly all look to have a similar
status to 140releng-armv7-default as far as lang/rust
failing so everything depending on lang/rust being broken.

Currently, the status of BE_WASM does not seem to matter
much for 14.0 or for main [so: 15], at least for the
FreeBSD package builders and their procedures.



Note: I used 140releng-armv7-default because building
main-armv7-default had hangup problems for months (except
when other failing ports blocked trying to build what
showed the hangup problems). So main-armv7-default
history from much of this year is not particularly
useful.

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com