Re: git: e1791d0f4478 - main - Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: Sync possible values for ssl

> On Oct 15, 2023, at 12:08 PM, Vladimir Druzenko <vvd@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> 15.10.2023 12:52, Muhammad Moinur Rahman пишет:
>> The branch main has been updated by bofh:
>> 
>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=e1791d0f4478ba0174bf70e5c9aaa228f19d74af
>> 
>> commit e1791d0f4478ba0174bf70e5c9aaa228f19d74af
>> Author: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <bofh@FreeBSD.org>
>> AuthorDate: 2023-10-15 09:49:59 +0000
>> Commit: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <bofh@FreeBSD.org>
>> CommitDate: 2023-10-15 09:51:27 +0000
>> 
>> Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: Sync possible values for ssl
>> 
>> Approved by: portmgr (blanket)
>> ---
>> Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk b/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk
>> index 2d7ca4c54b7b..5f02e4bbdb48 100644
>> --- a/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk
>> +++ b/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk
>> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ RUBY_DEFAULT?= 3.1
>> RUST_DEFAULT?= rust
>> # Possible values: 4.13, 4.16
>> SAMBA_DEFAULT?= 4.13
>> -# Possible values: base, openssl, libressl, libressl-devel
>> +# Possible values: base, openssl, openssl111, openssl31, openssl32, libressl, libressl-devel
> Maybe do it like for MySQL: base 30 111 31 32 37l 38l
No. This has been thought over and there are always new ssl engines coming up. I have never tried but I think you can also use wolfssl beerssl engines here which does not yield the results we are looking for. :/

And there is also openssl-quic or something so it's not easy numbering them. Although numbering is good for versions showing progressions over the time but I believe not in this case.

Kind regards,
Moin(bofh@ with all hats off)

>> . if !defined(SSL_DEFAULT)
>> # If no preference was set, check for an installed base version
>> # but give an installed port preference over it.
>> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Druzenko
> <OpenPGP_0x8006FAABBF942F73.asc>