git: 11c58a269405 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1u
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 11:42:29 UTC
The branch main has been updated by brnrd:
URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=11c58a2694053ae22d77c36419a7f6064cb8b32f
commit 11c58a2694053ae22d77c36419a7f6064cb8b32f
Author: Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2023-05-31 11:41:20 +0000
Commit: Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2023-05-31 11:41:20 +0000
security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1u
Security: eb9a3c57-ff9e-11ed-a0d1-84a93843eb75
MFH: 2023Q2
---
security/openssl/Makefile | 3 +-
security/openssl/distinfo | 6 +-
security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 | 305 -----------------------------
security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 | 108 ----------
security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 | 73 -------
5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 491 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/openssl/Makefile b/security/openssl/Makefile
index bd06e4c9cd84..958222c88b4a 100644
--- a/security/openssl/Makefile
+++ b/security/openssl/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
PORTNAME= openssl
-PORTVERSION= 1.1.1t
-PORTREVISION= 2
+PORTVERSION= 1.1.1u
PORTEPOCH= 1
CATEGORIES= security devel
MASTER_SITES= https://www.openssl.org/source/ \
diff --git a/security/openssl/distinfo b/security/openssl/distinfo
index 16117272b3a7..a37ebb5597c4 100644
--- a/security/openssl/distinfo
+++ b/security/openssl/distinfo
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-TIMESTAMP = 1675796483
-SHA256 (openssl-1.1.1t.tar.gz) = 8dee9b24bdb1dcbf0c3d1e9b02fb8f6bf22165e807f45adeb7c9677536859d3b
-SIZE (openssl-1.1.1t.tar.gz) = 9881866
+TIMESTAMP = 1685529813
+SHA256 (openssl-1.1.1u.tar.gz) = e2f8d84b523eecd06c7be7626830370300fbcc15386bf5142d72758f6963ebc6
+SIZE (openssl-1.1.1u.tar.gz) = 9892176
diff --git a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 b/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464
deleted file mode 100644
index 4eec12371299..000000000000
--- a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,305 +0,0 @@
-From 879f7080d7e141f415c79eaa3a8ac4a3dad0348b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100
-Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
-
-A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
-of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
-that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this
-vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
-exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
-(DoS) attack on affected systems.
-
-Fixes CVE-2023-0464
-
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20569)
----
- crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++-
- crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++---
- crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
- 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h
-index 5daf78de4585..344aa067659c 100644
---- crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h.orig
-+++ crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h
-@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
- };
-
- struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
-+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */
-+ size_t node_count;
-+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
-+ size_t node_maximum;
-+
- /* This is the tree 'level' data */
- X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
- int nlevel;
-@@ -159,7 +164,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
-- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+ int extra_data);
- void policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
- int policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
- const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
-diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c
-index e2d7b1532236..d574fb9d665d 100644
---- crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c.orig
-+++ crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c
-@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
-- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+ int extra_data)
- {
- X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
-
-+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
-+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
-+ return NULL;
-+
- node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
- if (node == NULL) {
- X509V3err(X509V3_F_LEVEL_ADD_NODE, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
-@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- node->data = data;
- node->parent = parent;
-- if (level) {
-+ if (level != NULL) {
- if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
- if (level->anyPolicy)
- goto node_error;
-@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- }
-
-- if (tree) {
-+ if (extra_data) {
- if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
- tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
- if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
-@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- }
-
-+ tree->node_count++;
- if (parent)
- parent->nchild++;
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c
-index 6e8322cbc5e3..6c7fd3540500 100644
---- crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c.orig
-+++ crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c
-@@ -13,6 +13,18 @@
-
- #include "pcy_local.h"
-
-+/*
-+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
-+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
-+ *
-+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
-+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
-+ */
-+
-+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
-+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
-+#endif
-+
- /*
- * Enable this to print out the complete policy tree at various point during
- * evaluation.
-@@ -168,6 +180,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
- }
-
-+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
-+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
-+
- /*
- * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
- *
-@@ -184,7 +199,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- level = tree->levels;
- if ((data = policy_data_new(NULL, OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
- goto bad_tree;
-- if (level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
-+ if (level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
- policy_data_free(data);
- goto bad_tree;
- }
-@@ -243,7 +258,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
- */
- static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-- X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
-+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
- X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
- int i, matched = 0;
-@@ -253,13 +269,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
-
- if (policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
-- if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
-+ if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- matched = 1;
- }
- }
- if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
-- if (level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+ if (level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- }
- return 1;
-@@ -272,7 +288,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
- */
- static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
-+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
- int i;
-
-@@ -280,7 +297,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
-
- /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
-- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
-+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
- return 0;
- }
- return 1;
-@@ -311,7 +328,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
- data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
- data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
-- if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
-+ if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
- policy_data_free(data);
- return 0;
- }
-@@ -373,7 +390,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- }
- /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
- if (last->anyPolicy &&
-- level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+ level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- return 1;
- }
-@@ -555,7 +572,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
- extra->qualifier_set = anyPolicy->data->qualifier_set;
- extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
- | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
-- node = level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, tree);
-+ node = level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, tree, 1);
- }
- if (!tree->user_policies) {
- tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
-@@ -582,7 +599,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
-
- for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
- cache = policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
-- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
-+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
- return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
-
- if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)
-From fd42c9126844f5eefa76872a1ffe5f529f8f75df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:37:22 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] Prepare for 1.1.1u-dev
-
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Release: yes
----
- CHANGES | 4 ++++
- NEWS | 4 ++++
- README | 2 +-
- include/openssl/opensslv.h | 4 ++--
- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES
-index 1e2d651b7514..f18b08cb0ee2 100644
---- CHANGES.orig
-+++ CHANGES
-@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commits/ and pick the appropriate
- release branch.
-
-+ Changes between 1.1.1t and 1.1.1u [xx XXX xxxx]
-+
-+ *)
-+
- Changes between 1.1.1s and 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
-
- *) Fixed X.400 address type confusion in X.509 GeneralName.
-diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
-index 2724fc4d85ba..8a18516d8609 100644
---- NEWS.orig
-+++ NEWS
-@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
- This file gives a brief overview of the major changes between each OpenSSL
- release. For more details please read the CHANGES file.
-
-+ Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1t and OpenSSL 1.1.1u [under development]
-+
-+ o
-+
- Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1s and OpenSSL 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
-
- o Fixed X.400 address type confusion in X.509 GeneralName (CVE-2023-0286)
-diff --git a/README b/README
-index b2f806be3a44..1957cf1f5515 100644
---- README.orig
-+++ README
-@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-
-- OpenSSL 1.1.1t 7 Feb 2023
-+ OpenSSL 1.1.1u-dev
-
- Copyright (c) 1998-2022 The OpenSSL Project
- Copyright (c) 1995-1998 Eric A. Young, Tim J. Hudson
-From fa425f20955c7948faed27f69ae4544f89c108ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:29:22 +1100
-Subject: [PATCH] changes: note about policy tree size limits and circumvention
-
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20569)
----
- CHANGES | 8 +++++++-
- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES
-index f18b08cb0ee2..17caf6775bfe 100644
---- CHANGES.orig
-+++ CHANGES
-@@ -9,7 +9,13 @@
-
- Changes between 1.1.1t and 1.1.1u [xx XXX xxxx]
-
-- *)
-+ *) Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate
-+ against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which
-+ should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit
-+ can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build
-+ time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow
-+ unlimited growth.
-+ [Paul Dale]
-
- Changes between 1.1.1s and 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
-
diff --git a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 b/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465
deleted file mode 100644
index db4b01e81287..000000000000
--- a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
-From 8bc232b14624b7af01801d7940b7dec59b3ae47d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:31:25 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] Updated CHANGES and NEWS for CVE-2023-0465
-
-Also updated the entries for CVE-2023-0464
-
-Related-to: CVE-2023-0465
-
-Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588)
----
- CHANGES | 9 ++++++++-
- NEWS | 4 +++-
- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES
-index 17caf6775bfe..efccf7838e65 100644
---- CHANGES.orig
-+++ CHANGES
-@@ -9,12 +9,19 @@
-
- Changes between 1.1.1t and 1.1.1u [xx XXX xxxx]
-
-+ *) Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are
-+ silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped
-+ for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert
-+ invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the
-+ certificate altogether. (CVE-2023-0465)
-+ [Matt Caswell]
-+
- *) Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate
- against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which
- should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit
- can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build
- time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow
-- unlimited growth.
-+ unlimited growth. (CVE-2023-0464)
- [Paul Dale]
-
- Changes between 1.1.1s and 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
-diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
-index 8a18516d8609..36a9bb6890bf 100644
---- NEWS.orig
-+++ NEWS
-@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
-
- Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1t and OpenSSL 1.1.1u [under development]
-
-- o
-+ o Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates
-+ (CVE-2023-0465)
-+ o Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464])
-
- Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1s and OpenSSL 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
-
-From b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf
- certs
-
-Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
-later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
-cert was bad.
-
-Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
-
-Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588)
----
- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 11 +++++++++--
- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-index 925fbb541258..1dfe4f9f31a5 100644
---- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c.orig
-+++ crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-@@ -1649,18 +1649,25 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
- }
- /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
- if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
-- int i;
-+ int i, cbcalled = 0;
-
- /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
-- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
-+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
- X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
-
- if (!(x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY))
- continue;
-+ cbcalled = 1;
- if (!verify_cb_cert(ctx, x, i,
- X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION))
- return 0;
- }
-+ if (!cbcalled) {
-+ /* Should not be able to get here */
-+ X509err(X509_F_CHECK_POLICY, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
-+ return 0;
-+ }
-+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
- return 1;
- }
- if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {
diff --git a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 b/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466
deleted file mode 100644
index f3635e6a8066..000000000000
--- a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,73 +0,0 @@
-From 0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:15:47 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()
-
-The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking.
-
-Fixes: CVE-2023-0466
-
-Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20564)
----
- CHANGES | 5 +++++
- NEWS | 1 +
- doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod | 9 +++++++--
- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES
-index efccf7838e65..b19f1429bbb0 100644
---- CHANGES.orig
-+++ CHANGES
-@@ -9,6 +9,11 @@
-
- Changes between 1.1.1t and 1.1.1u [xx XXX xxxx]
-
-+ *) Corrected documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() to mention
-+ that it does not enable policy checking. Thanks to
-+ David Benjamin for discovering this issue. (CVE-2023-0466)
-+ [Tomas Mraz]
-+
- *) Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are
- silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped
- for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert
-diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
-index 36a9bb6890bf..62615693fab8 100644
---- NEWS.orig
-+++ NEWS
-@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
-
- Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1t and OpenSSL 1.1.1u [under development]
-
-+ o Fixed documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() (CVE-2023-0466)
- o Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates
- (CVE-2023-0465)
- o Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464])
-diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-index f6f304bf7bd0..aa292f9336fc 100644
---- doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod.orig
-+++ doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-@@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ B<trust>.
- X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B<param> to
- B<t>. Normally the current time is used.
-
--X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled
--by default) and adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
-+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
-+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable
-+policy checking.
-
- X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled
- by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B<policies>. Any existing
-@@ -377,6 +378,10 @@ and has no effect.
-
- The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i.
-
-+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as
-+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this.
-+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation.
-+
- =head1 COPYRIGHT
-
- Copyright 2009-2020 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.