From nobody Thu May 04 11:47:21 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QBsW03MJgz491vN; Thu, 4 May 2023 11:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QBsW02sXpz4Pgx; Thu, 4 May 2023 11:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1683200844; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SsjDQMPYx6khacgBD9o3gb+zzhUDoLXS2KAs0But6XY=; b=tzJ/xTl7LePSj73zwY8AXIwj5dKKIYay4d4X7cxAF3w7JQla7IHIjBPXj6z/CNvrTx4+Da MUWPEv0Pmz48hEKuDDpGfG/mIqJsGgaKWKd2xavQvhbiZ5nleYVucW094u1oUqKi4jwNJ6 bsj7EJi1u/vx4h8Kwum4+W/Map3iOSeGlNIxBMUKMBbPAQLMyhY49Z4s35LxR++lsiGi5G zgHNu9qdnS95AMr6MRfsUw6N/LL+8wgdiQq6JSKAPYZX9MZUiCoSJOrHVimvIjEMDkN4SW smWqjHlmuVdBgAb86cZ3ANJybt670WivwavIJfwqcmYE6+78I2QMH9dvBbh8sw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1683200844; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SsjDQMPYx6khacgBD9o3gb+zzhUDoLXS2KAs0But6XY=; b=YqQp1cXPZkno6Chi8E8y+PdfkpJJjjP46RL2JD9tGJ/B58+2hj12Av1eZUghxwlmhbJgPZ NeLuww4XxjBrpq0sLfgdhtmMZ76QFLc4iRhIYOr1g9OLeoDM3FWZLiPHJONt3QnnzEz1yz uqjWFfTYkdYOcPm3DPS7DbW09ysUeJHJNvPesO3U5Kz5TO3D2yHF82nt1UqQsMe/EMEyp0 Djp3JetLi81SX4vGC/RV5ptyKoPztjfOKYUTwXPlL2lAv5SEVFfcfm7dp3aBKMDvolSQIH 9d5gI9Ha0Mg+dBrKah6YPhLMZEre96UBF7yjGjwE2T5rUk1OIbdrtB/68gCpZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1683200844; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=B/z5Wiok4G6+45HKQ0rIwINVEjDapMWiCVfjNDn1/Nh05JGnGeHZBkG38WAx2IQx491RoU Zw+Knt/GmogsFo6vfYhor8krTp9DRU0yK1pIYYoBfUONcn4OvOWcqH2j8wLKWgv/1W8T9i lav5asn4uaralsN/Xe2+N8B+IMz7hvllacQqTGm7b0I0yTSoZHymtlXz4KSQ95SvJN7VoV 7sy02Jaiv2ld1Y5tkJHWIAKiawJmfTfsthf3XRgkr2wPoeYnjvzGOKEUgfiXQKAN0l1Y0f b9nmSAAoh4O40CB1KepBI7cNwc3xQTiikV85Kcas/waaeZeOgqTvrzQXKNqsEg== Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:3a4d::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QBsW01FWVz195R; Thu, 4 May 2023 11:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D9D3AAF37C; Thu, 4 May 2023 13:47:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 13:47:21 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Emmanuel Vadot , Jan Beich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 688aaad7506f - main - multimedia/baka-mplayer: drop maintainership Message-ID: References: <202305040547.3445lRJT081049@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20230504084913.343a53331b98999b34eece00@bidouilliste.com> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 08:51:47AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 08:49:13AM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > ... > > Dropping maintainership should also bump PORTREVISION for those > > reasons: > > > > 1/ Package metadata changed so the checksum changed, even if we are > > really bad at reproducible build we should do the best we can for it. > > 2/ Users will not be warned that the port isn't maintained anymore as > > the version didn't changed so the package will not be updated on their > > machine. > > We suffer quite a lot already from needless port revision bumps, please > don't fuel this fire. These are not good enough reasons for force folks > to rebuild their perfectly fine packages. We only bump when there was > something really wrong with the previous package. Manu is right and you are not here, the point here is for binary packages to get rebuild and so users have the right maintainer to send an email to as a maintainer on their installed system if needed. > > The only problem with these commits that they were per-port and thus > generated some needless spam. > > ./danfe