From nobody Thu May 04 08:51:47 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QBncM2Q9Zz49rjs; Thu, 4 May 2023 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QBncM1tVLz43gt; Thu, 4 May 2023 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1683190307; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xji6aE0IbjgAzSzuXOSiTqMuldZIAy4kXekwABj+YVI=; b=L2cjhJksieVYjzsavKN6DBYDKM0S9WwNyLZ8Gmj+8JxJ5x8LCVuuDI7J7ISB2xYUpt2Stx HB0+kMUJ9LeRldkS2tFuBJ05ZmDMneKLlJ3D1/VWK98tWPYam1D6lNXkvD2I7PlrCCOLbD npwQ3z3KNefIIZfkGPXsp1T1jaH9z7RXianac86WkcNs/nPvAuA6ZJjCUVJ0OJ4oOAPWpg kBgz9OqROi5MiNg+cvDomNNvIYsSNIbuTvWNzFWFJ4A7pxVI8yGlCF9CBRVn3aWw718OIG xeQ4IUztKLiqXUk7fNjBeFNXhDLA86o/6AMtt5HHSsLXjRNMih8p3uAMIRY0hA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1683190307; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xji6aE0IbjgAzSzuXOSiTqMuldZIAy4kXekwABj+YVI=; b=YE257U4kbVW2RWhJmsNwZ2W7oaWrFQNHn3i87k5s7WbHg64rZosjvIC9sOJmDsXDMr8s57 7oNNwgVcCE4jZSsbuYUZGsxfLDuRLUpIY124KoCKhSJkwMqnJjcXWHx9hniusPY4cX7Mp/ BX9J7SsHu9jsTZ0gjBtbc6fr7lQkR1n759gIjxnxIndC5hGM4qzEDIa0TeqbVi3D9I5nT/ 0map5Z4M9w5lDhwvLOEE5TAbDO+iE0bXatdMA+EkzyEiu8gLc/Ed3euhVeP2DJ/73y0RLG XYBqAUC82W5pgCiz2ibqj+Vhgairkm/T9mVutj94caWusnYTZXUhCqIqJKt2HQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1683190307; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QRaOQkmbTOoKi/gwEvAdncIQhwZO1CRbtosItkzDxVzLHC7mU6OIF9r+YdmYMFro0/W+/k 0dctAcxCIddq1BjZrbcc7/qs0mFRRM3TgSLn3t1VIw8U/+Qf/8pbvhETOxey4EHPK/zZji /wbBwS2K1LV7bMM12FNW5hVOLbERIGpu9t0UqN9Y1rT1p8NMIdyq9AP2lzF+FWU/YqC9mX WNY8MdXLhwBizWDd4BxzpnT5ohtv3OXWmgyBClES7GJp/WP4r572yE0q/I+dP4prW/zIKQ neeJOfcBwzN0mnaS8prkxGqSbFPeaLaM+XOYCL6CoVWa4MvbffKe4YeFkWE9yQ== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 2A65F16497; Thu, 4 May 2023 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 08:51:47 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Emmanuel Vadot Cc: Jan Beich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 688aaad7506f - main - multimedia/baka-mplayer: drop maintainership Message-ID: References: <202305040547.3445lRJT081049@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20230504084913.343a53331b98999b34eece00@bidouilliste.com> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230504084913.343a53331b98999b34eece00@bidouilliste.com> X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 08:49:13AM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > ... > Dropping maintainership should also bump PORTREVISION for those > reasons: > > 1/ Package metadata changed so the checksum changed, even if we are > really bad at reproducible build we should do the best we can for it. > 2/ Users will not be warned that the port isn't maintained anymore as > the version didn't changed so the package will not be updated on their > machine. We suffer quite a lot already from needless port revision bumps, please don't fuel this fire. These are not good enough reasons for force folks to rebuild their perfectly fine packages. We only bump when there was something really wrong with the previous package. The only problem with these commits that they were per-port and thus generated some needless spam. ./danfe