Re: git: ae7f77bb682a - main - devel/libevent-devel: new port had been copied from `devel/libevent'
- Reply: Alexey Dokuchaev : "Re: git: ae7f77bb682a - main - devel/libevent-devel: new port had been copied from `devel/libevent'"
- In reply to: Alexey Dokuchaev : "Re: git: ae7f77bb682a - main - devel/libevent-devel: new port had been copied from `devel/libevent'"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 20:36:48 UTC
On 2023-06-05 13:48, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:39:43PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: >> Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> > +MAINTAINER= kbowling@FreeBSD.org >> >> Did you get approval before assigning the new port to someone >> other than yourself? > > Or it could be perceived as "stealing" a port which would lose > its -devel suffix one day. Also, it's kind of a fake repocopy > (because there are no real ones in Git) and it helps to track > history better, to some extent. > > That said, feel free to reassign as you see appropriate if you > strongly disagree. > > ./danfe Hi, This fails to fetch and we're already tracking this in the PR Jan mentioned. https://github.com/libevent/libevent/releases/download/release-2.2.1-alpha-dev/libevent-2.2.1-alpha-dev.tar.gz: Not Found On top of that there are upstream patches needed to make it usable for testing. I also share the view that we should avoid adding ports before assigning it to someone else without approval. Best regards, Daniel